I need 2 B4 owners to test the new hi-flow airbox velocity stack...
#23
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
if it makes it that far I would donate my a4 for any testing such as this . newer oem filter less than 2k 15k on o2 sensors S3 maf installed but i have hoses and an sxtb+ to install ... I would remove any of this if needed for testing purposes i know its probly along way away if it even happens but i just thought i would mention this
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<center><img src="http://www.eurometrix.ws/hbf1.JPG"></center><p>
...largely "straight wall" concept for the Filter-box Exit Velocity Stack vs. the Recovery Sleeve. The former appears to work by:
-increasing the <i>effective</i> entry diameter;
-straightening the air flow; &
-increasing the air speed, which in turn
induces more mass flow.
While the latter may only need Bernoulli's Principal to function, and a simple constant curved wall venturi there, may provide the least restriction.
I think any significant cone wall curve in a V-stack design, may in fact choke off the air speed gain that a shallow angled, straight-walled cone, V-stack provides.
The above photo is Eurometrix's reproduction of the classic Porsche high-butterfly V-stack. Porsche's numerous & apparently successful designs all seem to follow this model.
What I achieved (see photo below) was, in part, really only to eliminate from your original, the two transitions: from rim to cone (the entry); & from cone to tube (the exit). The cone wall proper, now only has a slight curve:
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/124134/b4_bucket_.jpg">
I particularly like your new design as you appear to have been able to get the entry-bell turned/rolled back further than I could with your older one (see above).
from TWM Induction:
"The full radius (entry) design is accepted by the performance industry as the best for maximum air flow." This even though they also sell non full-radius types.
They are in effect saying that the full radius type function better than the "shorty" type.
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/williams_2.jpg">
An example of their full radius horns above; & below.
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/AirHornDimension2.gif">
Below is their <i>non</i> Full Radius "shorty" type:
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/AirHornDimension3.gif">
I believe that the best V-stacks may require this -<i>straight</i>- cone wall feature in order to function as the classic designs all seem to share this common characteristic. Perhaps this is the missing feature that caused your curved-wall filter-box exit V-stacks to flow less favourably?
...largely "straight wall" concept for the Filter-box Exit Velocity Stack vs. the Recovery Sleeve. The former appears to work by:
-increasing the <i>effective</i> entry diameter;
-straightening the air flow; &
-increasing the air speed, which in turn
induces more mass flow.
While the latter may only need Bernoulli's Principal to function, and a simple constant curved wall venturi there, may provide the least restriction.
I think any significant cone wall curve in a V-stack design, may in fact choke off the air speed gain that a shallow angled, straight-walled cone, V-stack provides.
The above photo is Eurometrix's reproduction of the classic Porsche high-butterfly V-stack. Porsche's numerous & apparently successful designs all seem to follow this model.
What I achieved (see photo below) was, in part, really only to eliminate from your original, the two transitions: from rim to cone (the entry); & from cone to tube (the exit). The cone wall proper, now only has a slight curve:
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/124134/b4_bucket_.jpg">
I particularly like your new design as you appear to have been able to get the entry-bell turned/rolled back further than I could with your older one (see above).
from TWM Induction:
"The full radius (entry) design is accepted by the performance industry as the best for maximum air flow." This even though they also sell non full-radius types.
They are in effect saying that the full radius type function better than the "shorty" type.
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/williams_2.jpg">
An example of their full radius horns above; & below.
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/AirHornDimension2.gif">
Below is their <i>non</i> Full Radius "shorty" type:
<img src="http://www.twminduction.com/AirHorn/AirHorn.imgs/AirHornDimension3.gif">
I believe that the best V-stacks may require this -<i>straight</i>- cone wall feature in order to function as the classic designs all seem to share this common characteristic. Perhaps this is the missing feature that caused your curved-wall filter-box exit V-stacks to flow less favourably?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
audiinnj
A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
9
12-05-2018 04:31 AM
S4intheOC
Vehicles For Sale - Archive (NO NEW POSTS HERE)
0
09-08-2015 12:12 AM
CPLYONS
A8 / S8 (D3 Platform) Discussion
7
09-07-2015 07:19 PM