A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

A4 2wd vs Quattro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2000, 10:58 AM
  #21  
AudiWorld Super User
 
CC Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is this your guess, or do you have data to back that up?
Old 10-13-2000, 11:10 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
ModifiedA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 34,209
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ditto.
Old 10-13-2000, 11:16 AM
  #23  
AudiWorld Super User
 
hurricanesteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ASR baby...

I had a 98.5 2.8 FWD tip sport that I swapped for a 99.5 1.8TQMS...after driving both in the wet, I'll say this:

I felt safer and more confident in the 2.8 FWD with ASR (traction control). I could take a corner in the wet as hard as I wanted and ASR would back off the throttle and ease on the brakes to make the corner. You could do no wrong.

My new quattro will understeer and oversteer depending on throttle...so I could probably go as fast through the corner and accelerate out FASTER than before, BUUUUUUT...if you don't get it just right: NO TRACTION...wreck. I was reintroduced to oversteer in this car...if you're coming into even a low speed corner and lift off the throttle, the back end will come out.

steve
Old 10-13-2000, 11:18 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
CARYB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fwd here also, no regrets, Kumho tires keep it glued to road. It's for sale, and most people want...

quattro, so I am having a hard time selling ,mine. I added Kumho's and can't break it loose in the rain at all!!
Old 10-13-2000, 12:33 PM
  #25  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
RickM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 36,423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oops, missed that. Never mind!
Old 10-13-2000, 12:42 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
der Delfin '02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FrontTrak vs. Quattro - Agility versus Traction (more)...

I have driven '97 1.8T both FWD and Quattro.
The FWD seemed zippier, meaning it weighed at least 250-350 lbs. lighter (which is noticable). Just a driver versus fully loaded 5 passengers is noticable too (in a 1.8T at least).

I forgot the weight penalty to HP "loss" formula, but the 1.8T FWD is quicker off the line (assuming it is a straight dry line)

The sheer physics of the power coming from a front mounted engine and being transferred to the rear adds a slight delay in power transmission, inherent power loss due to friction of gears and driveshaft/axels... and all this hardware adds weight too (as mentioned before).

If you live in some place like Denver or Seattle, or you love going Alpine trekking/skiiing... don't settle for anything but Quattro.

To be honest, do you think anyone who drives a Quattro would complain about it and tell you to save the $1700 and get a FWD??? I doubt it. Just as everyone who has Xenon would tell you it was well worth it.

Who wants to feel like they wasted their money??? Not me.

A $400 chip to increase horsepower by 30-40%... now that's a deal!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Detroit313
A8 / S8 (D4 Platform) Discussion
24
02-16-2016 11:36 AM
Rodney
Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3
11
06-14-2005 09:35 PM
roccus50
Audi 90 / 80 / Coupe quattro / Cabriolet
27
07-13-2004 06:47 AM
foss
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
15
01-01-2002 01:39 PM
evanglista
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
20
09-30-1999 08:20 AM



Quick Reply: A4 2wd vs Quattro



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15 AM.