anything against older A4's?? need advice
#11
Re: Maybe so, but still, many believe this. Probably due to stuf CR wouldn't care about like...
If safety is a concern, 2001.5 gets you side curtains, (not available in 99.5), plus electronic lumbar on the seats.
#13
I agree. I'm talking more about the older models. But then again...
For many, the stock HP and upgraded wheels (which I do like a lot) will be the first things to change on an A4. And you have to admit, the stock wheels suck ***.
#15
I agree, 99.5 is the best year. Here's why:
Non-DBW, 1st version w/ 1-piece projectors, the last version w/ the cool 7-spoke sport pkg wheels, all-red dash illumination, and can be had for less than a comparable 00-01.5 model!
I was looking hard for a 99.5, but settled on a 99. Good luck!
I was looking hard for a 99.5, but settled on a 99. Good luck!
#16
That is if you want to upgrade. 12Valve A4s stock are not all that slow, and is more reliable.
Before flame wars begin, I'll sing my usual tune: You never know how well that 1.8T was maintained, you are taking much less of a chance with a normaly aspirated 12Valve.
Chipped 1.8T is 7 sec 0-60 12Valve with an intake and a throttle body will be in low sevens and will probably be more reliable in the long run.
Chipped 1.8T is 7 sec 0-60 12Valve with an intake and a throttle body will be in low sevens and will probably be more reliable in the long run.
#17
Re: steer clear of the 12 valve 2.8, which is what all '96 2.8s are...
I am looking at a 96 12v 2.8 quattro as well. It has 111k on it but it was dealer serviced. Only two items that bug me a/c doesnt blow cold and owner is not too sure about the timing belt if it has been changed. I also went on to MSN carpoint and some of the owner reviews are not too positive in terms of reliability and cost to maintain. Help !
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post