A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

Audi Rep at Chicago Auto Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-1999, 07:49 AM
  #1  
Sameer Pandya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Audi Rep at Chicago Auto Show

Funny thing, i was talking to the rep about whether the 1.8T would be boosted to 180HP for the new models (just to see what he says) and he said no, but that i can chip the engine to 200HP. He said he had a chip in his, and loved it. He went on to mention that chip tuners advertise in Audi Quattro mag. <br>Its funny to hear that from a Autoshow rep, who tours the nation with the display. Also saw the Saab 9-3 Coupe. It will be hard to decide between the two!<br>
Old 02-15-1999, 08:18 AM
  #2  
Ray Calvo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Re Saab 9-3: from what I've heard and read (Road &amp; track test), they're troublesome
Old 02-15-1999, 08:28 AM
  #3  
DaveL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We have a chipped 1.8T and a 9-3...go with the A4...9-3 has awful turbo lag and torque steer
Old 02-15-1999, 08:44 AM
  #4  
Stu Koch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Had to make same decison

I choose the A4 because of Quattro and some reliability probs with Saabs. However, the high-output turbi was not avail. when I was looking. For me it came down to the Saab for the convertible or the Audi for the quattro. If you don't have any snow where you live, I would say that the 9-3 is a good car.<p>Stu Koch<br>99 2.8 qts
Old 02-15-1999, 09:33 AM
  #5  
Eric L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default About the 9-3...

just remember that the body is based on the mid-80's Opel platform (maybe the Omega), which in the European motor press has been slammed for its lack of rigidity and general "oldness." I was in the same situation and now drive an A4. Make sure you drive both in the twisties and see which one you like.<p>My $0.02<p>Eric
Old 02-15-1999, 09:49 PM
  #6  
tHe UnAbImMeR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default thats odd....Insurance rating is favorable for Saab.

in fact, the 9-3 along with Volvo S70 are cheaper to insure than my GEO Prizm!<br>The A4 isn't.....
Old 02-15-1999, 10:39 PM
  #7  
Randy Welch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: About the 9-3...

The 9-3 ( aka NG900 ) is actually based on the Vectra chassis if I remember correctly. And based on the reviews I've seen in Britians Car magazine they 9-3 compares out quite well. Light years ahead of the NG900 and Classic 900 by all accounts in terms of handling.<p>I actually prefer the Saab 4 cyl over the VAG 1.8. Hence why my A4 is equipped with a V6. Now the new Saab 9-3 Viggen could be an interesting car....<p>-randy<br>98.5 2.8qms<br>93 Saab 9000 CSE
Old 02-15-1999, 11:58 PM
  #8  
Roger B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: thats odd....Insurance rating is favorable for Saab.

I don't know about the 9-3, but I was considering a Saab 9-5 2.3T, BMW 323i and A4 2.8Q when I was car shopping. My insurance company quoted me $1150 per year for A4, $1400 for the 323i and $1600 for the Saab 9-5. It wasn't that big of a factor in my final decision, but I like the fact that my A4 was the cheapest to insure.<p>- Rog<br>'99 Silver 2.8QMS
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BmwSlayer is rising
Audi 5000 / 200 / V8 Discussion
12
08-27-2005 05:39 AM
NerdKonvention
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
18
10-30-2002 01:44 PM
podracerx
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
8
08-12-2002 09:05 PM
oodi200
Audi 5000 / 200 / V8 Discussion
1
07-14-2002 09:06 AM
jonboy
A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion
0
07-10-2002 04:10 PM



Quick Reply: Audi Rep at Chicago Auto Show



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 PM.