A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

Hmmmm........ my thoughts on the Milltek Cat....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2003, 08:24 PM
  #1  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OneEighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hmmmm........ my thoughts on the Milltek Cat....

Magnaflow/carsound 2.5" Generic High Flow Cat - $98 from such sites like bigexhaust.com

Roll of wire to extend 2nd 02 sensors to prevent a CEL - probably have some lying around

Having an exhaust shop weld the HFC after your DP/flex joint to your current setup - $150 max

Cat replacement pipe for OEM location - $30-220(quality dependant)

Watching your boost gauge spool up like a wiperblade on PCP as you smoke your friend who blew $649 on a OEM location direct fit HFC - <b> PRICELESS </b>
Old 10-09-2003, 08:25 PM
  #2  
Elder Member
 
chipstar-32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do it. if you do, i'd really like to see how it works for you
Old 10-09-2003, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OneEighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been running the setup for months... running all my OneEighth Parts.......
Old 10-09-2003, 08:29 PM
  #4  
Elder Member
 
chipstar-32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice man. what hfc did you get?
Old 10-09-2003, 08:45 PM
  #5  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
OneEighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default you should remember..........

After prototying two of my own, one Sameer bought and sold to skabaru, one Juan M. runs.

I use a test pipe and magnaflow HFC.
Old 10-09-2003, 11:44 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Chard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default so putting on a test pipe in place of the cat

and relocating the cat to under the car makes more power than just replacing the old cat with an HFC? I don't see the difference other than location.
Old 10-10-2003, 04:10 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Expert
 
Digit@lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 26,669
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I believe RAD69 has done something very similar.
Old 10-10-2003, 05:15 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
RAD69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice... You really do notice the turbo spool faster, right?
Old 10-10-2003, 07:05 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
skabaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 16,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

word
Old 10-10-2003, 08:20 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
SameerP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default yes, location makes a difference...

the exhaust gas is tumbling, hot and at its most expanded state immediately aft the turbo. Having a matrix of cells right there (cat) for the gas to push through is best for emissions, but not for power.

Relocating that cat lets the tumbling hot gas dump into a simple tube, travel downstream, somewhat cool. So the cat downstream isn't as significant a flow restrictor.

Its also healthier for the engine in that the cat gets very hot (pop your hood after a spirited drive and feel the heat from the cat) by getting it out of th engine bay, you are dropping temps in that area, which is a good thing.

Cheers,
Sameer


Quick Reply: Hmmmm........ my thoughts on the Milltek Cat....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM.