A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

The inner workings of a control arm ball joint..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2006, 11:52 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Justin517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah i had heard the 3 series had some major probs with them.
Old 04-03-2006, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Member
 
77'911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,592
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Most Bimmers do, its kind of an "ism" with them....

We've had a number of 3 and 5 series in the family and they all go through front end parts, even with just daily driving. The upgraded bushings do make it better though.
Old 04-03-2006, 12:03 PM
  #13  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Justin517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default worse than audi?

im assuming yes from the 20k comemnt before about a friends 323.
Old 04-03-2006, 12:10 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
ModifiedA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 34,209
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default i ended up using redline CV2 grease...

its supposed to be pretty inert with regards to swelling plastics and rubber. Plus it has the highest temp rating and lowest water wash rating i could find.

im still on my original control arms/tie rod ends after 5 years 86,000miles.
Old 04-03-2006, 12:12 PM
  #15  
Member
 
77'911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,592
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: worse than audi?

If you track and Audi they can wear that fast. For daily driving, BMWs go through front ends much faster then Audis. Each car has its different "isms". I think for Audi, its a higher cost in wheel bearings, timing belt/waterpump jobs. For say 3 series cars, its control arms, window regulators, mounts, some electronic glitches. Overall, BMWs are a tade less to maintain due to the fact they are less complex(no awd drivetrain on rwd of course).
Old 04-03-2006, 12:29 PM
  #16  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Audiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's supposed to be a teflon lining. Maybe Aluminum is not a good long term choice for ball joints
Old 04-03-2006, 12:56 PM
  #17  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Chard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I've changed my control arms to the CPP links

and I'm not getting any more road noise than with my stock ones. I have to say that it really is a cut in the cost for materials. I haven't had to change my control arms in another other vehicle as early.
Old 04-03-2006, 01:23 PM
  #18  
WJM
AudiWorld Super User
 
WJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,474
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default no... steel on Al = galvanic corrosion and galling

plastic liners are the best bet, they provide a permanent lubrication

I dont know what people expect out of a ball joint, but 80k miles of constant small motions is a LOT of cycles...
Old 04-03-2006, 01:24 PM
  #19  
WJM
AudiWorld Super User
 
WJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,474
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Poll... how many people responding to this thread are mech engineers??
Old 04-03-2006, 01:56 PM
  #20  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JAFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 17,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default lower arms too?....

how much for the lowers if tyou have them?


Quick Reply: The inner workings of a control arm ball joint..



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 AM.