A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi A4 produced from 1995-2001 B5 FAQ

random pics of my car and my buddy's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2004, 07:10 AM
  #51  
Head Cat Herder

 
Kris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 66,550,451
Received 85 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Yep, those things are FAR from slow. Heck, even a chipped S4 is plenty fast...
Old 04-30-2004, 07:11 AM
  #52  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
chipstar-32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default or a sportec stage 3 s4

got a few rides....good Lord are they fast. like legitimately fast. i like to think my car is fast. newp. i was just grinning after my rides
Old 04-30-2004, 07:18 AM
  #53  
Member
 
[ej257]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 34,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Too big, too heavy, too poor handling, too poor braking, too numb steering, way too expensive

plus I'm a coupe/sedan man, not a wagon fan.
Old 04-30-2004, 07:19 AM
  #54  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
chipstar-32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch
Old 04-30-2004, 07:19 AM
  #55  
Member
 
[ej257]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 34,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default It's not just about pure speed. Drive the Evo then drive a fully modded S4

the Evo drives completely different, like a real performance car, the S4 is still way too plush, way too soft in the corners, and has no steering feedback or handling ability in comparo. Plus by the time you get an S4 to perform anywhere near the level of a stock Evo you have spent a LOT of money. 4k in the evo gets you 450hp 450 ft lbs.

I want raw performance in a gorgeous shell.
Old 04-30-2004, 07:20 AM
  #56  
Elder Member
Thread Starter
 
chipstar-32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

m3
Old 04-30-2004, 07:21 AM
  #57  
Member
 
[ej257]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 34,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

$55k v. $27k. If I was rich I would have 5 of each, but I'm not, so it's bang for buck.
Old 04-30-2004, 07:22 AM
  #58  
Member
 
[ej257]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 34,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Just because you're happy with a slow poor handling Audi doesn't mean I would be!

Old 04-30-2004, 09:22 AM
  #59  
New Member
 
psychobooe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Actually...

It's true that Prodrive does build the WRC cars, but they use stock STi's to do it. WRC is one of the few racing series' that uses substantial components from the factory cars. The 2.0 liter flat four in the WRC Subaru is basically the same engine in my car.
By the way, if you claim the Audi R8 Le Mans car, I'm gonna scream.

psycho
Old 04-30-2004, 10:48 AM
  #60  
Head Cat Herder

 
Kris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 66,550,451
Received 85 Likes on 48 Posts
Default Basically in that it's a horizontally opposed flat 4 with turbocharger...

that's about where the similarity ends. They are NOT the same engine (that would be the Euro/Japanese spec engine IIRC). Yeah, they use the stock body shell, which is stripped, seam welded, safety cages welded in, etc.. the suspension uses the same pickup points, but is far from the same as yours. The transmission in a WRC car probably costs as much as your car.

Some of the lower classes run basically production cars, but the WRC cars are not 100% production cars.

What does the R8 have to do with this discussion? that is a full blown race car, not intended in any way to resemble a production car.


Quick Reply: random pics of my car and my buddy's



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 AM.