WClark

He is entitled to his opinion but he clearly doesnt know squat about the V1. He was a paid consultant for Bel and Valentine didnt want to have anything to do with him. Sour grapes?

Read this...<ul><li><a href="http://www.valentine1.com/lab/V1Hater.asp">http://www.valentine1.com/lab/V1Hater.asp</a</li></ul>

adammorley

that makes me feel better.

Evan (Vogon)

why, because the competetion says that the competetion is a crock?

adammorley

is remote capability like the bel remote....but back and front with laser too...

WClark

...He is not an expert either on radar detectors or test methods. He doesnt know dick about the V1 and that shows in the writeup.

...He is not an unbiased "tester" as his web page claims. He is a paid consultant for at least 2 of those companies.

I have no problem with any of the detectors in the "test", other than I prefer and own the V1, and I am sure the Bel980 is a fine unit. I have a big problem with places like radartest.com and people like Peterson that masquerade as one thing (a public service) and are nothing more than self serving ads. At least Valentine puts its opinions on its own web site, so you know where it is coming from.