A4 (B6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B6 Audi A4 produced from 2002-2005

I know the Road & Track report on 3.0 quattro has been discussed at length ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2002, 12:44 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Bada Bing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,474
Received 41 Likes on 34 Posts
Default I know the Road & Track report on 3.0 quattro has been discussed at length ...

but I just don't understand their whole theme throughout the article that the new A4 is more skewed toward the luxury side than the sporty side. I mean they tested the sportiest stock version of the A4 available (3.0 qms). The standard suspension set-up on the new A4 is supposedly equal to the sport set-up of the previous generation A4, which would lead me to conclude that the sport package versions would handle even better than before. Also, the old car with a 190-hp engine was apparently 0.6 seconds quicker to 60 mph, something I find hard to believe despite the extra weight of the new model.

The sidebar comparison of the A4 3.0 qms against the 330i and X-Type 3.0 was quite telling. How can an automatic 330i can be 1.2 seconds quicker to 60 mph compared to a 6-speed A4?

I tell you this, if I were to make up my mind predominantly based on this test report, I wouldn't even bother test driving the A4 3.0 qms. Even the AWD baby Jag can squeeze out 60 mph in 6.5 seconds. My theory is that Audi models (except the A8) need 10-15% more power compared to their rivals in order to overcome the drivetrain inefficiencies and additional weight of their cars.

I have test driven the new A4 3.0 qms and it did feel quicker and more sporty compared to the old 2.8 qms, which makes me wonder what a rocketship a 5-speed stick 330i must be to outgun this new A4 by well over a second to 60 mph!

One final thought: How is it that BMW automatic models suffer only slight degredation in 0-60 acceleration compared to stick (less than 0.5 second), while Audi's Tiptronic degrades performance significantly more (by > 1 second deterioration)?
Old 02-26-2002, 01:06 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
EricPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Road & Track must have some really bad drivers or bad proof readers.

Their 0-60 times are not even close to those reported by Audi, Car & Driver, and Motor Trend.

3.0L Quattro 6 speed 0-60mph:
Audi - 6.9 seconds
C&D (October 2001) - 6.8 seconds
MT - (February 2002) 7.0 seconds
R&T - 7.7 seconds

Huh, you tell me what does not fit?

Now 7.7 seconds is consistent with 3.0Q Tip 0-60 times. It is the same time listed by Audi. Plus, I got the same numbers this past weekend. See the link below.

Based off the other magazine numbers and my personal experience I feel pretty confident that Audi's 0-60 times for both the 6 speed (6.9) and Tip (7.7) are correct.<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/a4gen2/msgs/32826.phtml">https://forums.audiworld.com/a4gen2/msgs/32826.phtml</a</li></ul>
Old 02-26-2002, 01:22 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Bada Bing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,474
Received 41 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

You left out the C&D comparison test: 0-60 in 7.1 seconds
Old 02-26-2002, 01:30 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
EricPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Average that with their October test time (6.8) and you get 6.95 seconds.

<ul><li><a href="http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/features/2001/october/200110_roadtest_audia4.xml?&page=2">http://www.caranddriver.com/xp/Caranddriver/features/2001/october/200110_roadtest_audia4.xml?&page=2</a</li></ul>
Old 02-26-2002, 01:35 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A 330i should be quicker (lighter). A 330xi is a much better comparison.

And if you look at manufacturer numbers, you'll see that the numbers are very similar. The only significant difference that I see is the $7,700 you save on the Audi...<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/a4gen2/msgs/31322.phtml">https://forums.audiworld.com/a4gen2/msgs/31322.phtml</a</li></ul>
Old 02-26-2002, 01:45 PM
  #6  
New Member
 
a4molloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Beats my friends 330xi even if we switch cars a4 wins
Old 02-26-2002, 02:15 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Audi Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,237
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default "drivetrain inefficiencies"Audi's principle is an undriven wheel creates more drag than a driven one

It's a long-held principle. You would notice a diminshed top speed if it was "inefficient".
Old 02-26-2002, 02:47 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Bada Bing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,474
Received 41 Likes on 34 Posts
Default Yes, but at least 2 magazine tests have clocked the 330xi at 5.7-5.8 secs

I know that's a lot quicker than BMW claims. The first time I saw it in Motor Trend I was sure it was a typo, but they confirmed that number in an editorial reply. Then a second Car & Driver test (comparison of S4, 330xi and WRX) clocked it again in the same 5.7-5.8 range.
Old 02-26-2002, 04:15 PM
  #9  
New Member
 
4 circles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I think the strangest part of that review was the sentence...

in the "Test Notes:" section on page 65. "The suspension setup feels softer than on previous models." Since the test car had the sport package with 17" Michelin Pilots, I doubt you could find a production car in the same class with a stiffer suspension. It is also surprising that they make no mention of how the suspension handles while driving. I wonder if they actually left the smooth surface of the California Speedway parking lot.

WTD
Old 02-27-2002, 09:09 AM
  #10  
New Member
 
MoroBluMTM265's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The problem is weight...

The new A4 (3.0Q) is way overweight, it is almost 400 pounds heavier than a comparable 330i, thus the enormous performance difference.
Is Audi wants o be competitive they will have to:
A- make the A4 much lighter
B- Give it a larger (ie 3.6L V6), torquier engine


Quick Reply: I know the Road & Track report on 3.0 quattro has been discussed at length ...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:21 AM.