REALLY hating the Subaru commercials. The 240hp AWD answer to the $29k Subaru is an R32, SIMPLE!
#21
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
where did you purcahse it from? i see you have the oem fog light casing with the slits open just as they are on the drivers side.
i cant imagine how much faster your car is then mine... must be nice.
i cant imagine how much faster your car is then mine... must be nice.
#23
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<ul><li><a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~wotmotorsport/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/log-01-1aug04-1.xls">http://home.earthlink.net/~wotmotorsport/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/log-01-1aug04-1.xls</a</li></ul>
#25
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With the same basic engine set up in the new Legacy GT, did you see where the 2004 Forester XT listed for a 0 to 60 time....very impressive for a wagon/SUV type vehicle!
#27
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have seen the Subys and Evos post the EXACT same tack numbers in both wet and dry conditions. They are like friggin magicians. Trust me, it pisses me off. This is coming from some one putting down as much torque as the are. The damn cars were meant for one thing, and that is track use. They weigh 400lbs less than us to boot. Damn, I hate them...but I respect them as well
cheers! Mike
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)