Think this will buff out:(
#11
#12
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
it's not actually about speed change, it is force of impact. momentum. the velocity and mass of an object at the point of impact, not the change over time. (ie it is torque, not horsepower) as from that point on, it is not actually the brakes, but rather the impact which is slowing the vehicle anyway.
to illustrate this fact, imagine a bicycle hitting the door doing 40mph and not hitting the brakes. will the bags pop? no they will not, as the force of impact is less due to lower mass of the object in motion how about being hit by a train doing 15mph with brakes locked up? car will be mangled, even though the train is decelerating and travelling slower. it is all about force of impact. i am assuming that he was not hit by a train, or even a large truck, as the impact line is quite low, this would indicate a passenger vehicle.
i am not saying that the impact actually WAS 40 mph (in fact i am sure it wasnt, or the bags would have popped) i am also not saying that the brakes were not touched (you can't tell that from a picture), simply stating that the impact could not have happened from 10mph. if it were from 10 mph, it would have put a solid dent in the door, but not pushed it in that far.
to illustrate this fact, imagine a bicycle hitting the door doing 40mph and not hitting the brakes. will the bags pop? no they will not, as the force of impact is less due to lower mass of the object in motion how about being hit by a train doing 15mph with brakes locked up? car will be mangled, even though the train is decelerating and travelling slower. it is all about force of impact. i am assuming that he was not hit by a train, or even a large truck, as the impact line is quite low, this would indicate a passenger vehicle.
i am not saying that the impact actually WAS 40 mph (in fact i am sure it wasnt, or the bags would have popped) i am also not saying that the brakes were not touched (you can't tell that from a picture), simply stating that the impact could not have happened from 10mph. if it were from 10 mph, it would have put a solid dent in the door, but not pushed it in that far.
now picture the train standing still and the car hitting it at 5-10 mph, you have only about 30% chance of the air bags deploying considering this is a frontal collision, due to the car's ability to absorb energy, now make this 20 mph and they will definitely deploy, why?, because the train is so heavy that literally won't move at all, which relates to your theory of mass.
so that means that the car's speed changed so quick from 20 mph to 0 mph in about 300ms, now as we all know (I assume) the air bags take 120ms from crash sensor sensing the impact to full deployment and a human body weighing 160lbs would take 600ms to begin accelerating forward.
the air bag would actually stop the body from accelerating not actually dampening the impact to the steering wheel or dashboard.
in another example, which also uses the mass theory you can hit a bicycle at 60mph and the bags will remain intact, also very unlikely the bags will deploy if 10 bicycles hit you even if standing still.
sorry if I don't make any sense but this is the best I can explain.
this was 65 mph impact
#13
AudiWorld Member
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah, you don't make sense
a car hitting a train is a completely different scenario than the inverse, as you are no longer referring (fisrt of all) to side impact, so you have to leave bag popping out of it.
second of all, the car becomes the object in motion, so it has less mass moving at a given velocity, therefore, less force of impact... it is ok, if you don't get the physics. not everyone does.
a car hitting a train is a completely different scenario than the inverse, as you are no longer referring (fisrt of all) to side impact, so you have to leave bag popping out of it.
second of all, the car becomes the object in motion, so it has less mass moving at a given velocity, therefore, less force of impact... it is ok, if you don't get the physics. not everyone does.
#14
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah, you don't make sense
a car hitting a train is a completely different scenario than the inverse, as you are no longer referring (fisrt of all) to side impact, so you have to leave bag popping out of it.
second of all, the car becomes the object in motion, so it has less mass moving at a given velocity, therefore, less force of impact... it is ok, if you don't get the physics. not everyone does.
a car hitting a train is a completely different scenario than the inverse, as you are no longer referring (fisrt of all) to side impact, so you have to leave bag popping out of it.
second of all, the car becomes the object in motion, so it has less mass moving at a given velocity, therefore, less force of impact... it is ok, if you don't get the physics. not everyone does.
rate of deceleration is what triggers the bags, if you remember very early bags (benz 500se 1984) exploded almost on contact when in an accident, (some of them exploded even when hitting a hole in the street), because the technology was not been developed yet for smart airbags and cars were so much more rigid than today.
today car's structure specially in the front has so many crumpling materials that absorb a big amount of energy in an impact, thus preventing bag deployment unless the rate of deceleration is too great and if the seat occupancy sensor detect weight and the seat belts are not latched.
it takes a lot more today to deploy an air bag than 10 years ago, big train hitting an 03 a4 at 10mph from any angle is just going to push it and mangle it up, unless the wheels or at least two wheels lift off the ground.
at that point the curtain air bags will deploy but not the tensioners or the bags.
there's are 3 factors for this to happen and if you know about physics you very well know what they are and what the entire equation is call
Last edited by s4master1; 12-02-2010 at 06:41 PM.
#16
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the car's roof crumble slightly near the sunroof and under the rear seat was some wrinkling, but all doors were able to open and close, as you can see the rear window glass was untouched, no bag deployment due to the fact that we were push about 30 yards.
CHP was amazed and thankful of two things,
one, we were driving this car and not a small economy car
two, the other car did not crashed against a big truck
otherwise somebody would've died that day.
thank you to all engineers for keeping improving all things and making our lives safer and easier and more comfortable.
Last edited by s4master1; 12-03-2010 at 05:45 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dmitry D.
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
4
06-24-2005 09:24 AM
nansaidh
TT (Mk1) Discussion
41
05-27-2002 12:05 PM