A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B8 Audi A4 produced from 2008.5

modded 2010 a4 b8 k04 vs modded 2010 camaro ss auto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2011, 07:20 PM
  #21  
AudiWorld Member
 
AndrewF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rockaway, NJ
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW. I am speechless. I have no idea why I just read all of that.

Anyway.... When my 2.7t was stage 1 it took the Camaro 0-100 by over 5 lengths, we were both shocked. Chevy's numbers are BS, not SS.

-andy
Old 07-25-2011, 08:25 AM
  #22  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
1990CamaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vinb8
I went up against a 2010 modded camaro ss auto. he had a cat back exhaust, hyperteck ecu,and a hennesy intake. i got the 6 speed manual 2010 a4 s line b8 with apr k04, 034 hfc, awe turboback exhaust, k&n typhoon, apr 100 octane map, short shifter, awe fmic, and eurocode hfic pipe. we went on a closed course and he wasnt pulling on me at all. on a 30 mph roll on in second gear i was walking him a little bit. then off the line he got a little jump on me and i was on his rear bumper and was starting to catch up to him. so heres the comparison on a modded k04 b8 and a modded 2010 camaro ss. i wish i had a vid for you guys but i was alone in the car and so was he and i have no camera mount yet.
so basically, you're saying you outran a intake/tune/catback L99 Camaro with around 340-350bhp. if it was a stock L99 i could possibly see it, as long as he was spinning through 2nd and 3rd gear. he has 50-60bhp (stock) on you, and only weighs about 100lbs more.

oh yes, i forgot though, he has bolt-ons. which the LS motors take to like a fat kid to cake. not to mention the tune which deactivates torque management, which he should then be around 370-380rwhp and 390-400rwtq. so i'm sorry, either he wasn't in it all the way, or you're bsing.
Old 07-25-2011, 06:15 PM
  #23  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
ItsDubC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^Welcome to AW!
Old 07-25-2011, 08:36 PM
  #24  
AudiWorld Member
 
MonzaA5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 550
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1990CamaroRS
so basically, you're saying you outran a intake/tune/catback L99 Camaro with around 340-350bhp. if it was a stock L99 i could possibly see it, as long as he was spinning through 2nd and 3rd gear. he has 50-60bhp (stock) on you, and only weighs about 100lbs more.

oh yes, i forgot though, he has bolt-ons. which the LS motors take to like a fat kid to cake. not to mention the tune which deactivates torque management, which he should then be around 370-380rwhp and 390-400rwtq. so i'm sorry, either he wasn't in it all the way, or you're bsing.
You registered just to post that?
Old 07-25-2011, 09:03 PM
  #25  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
1990CamaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MonzaA5
You registered just to post that?
mostly yes. i hate the spread of misinformation. that and i'm looking into getting an '86 4000 CS
Old 07-27-2011, 05:14 AM
  #26  
AudiWorld Member
 
PDong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1990CamaroRS
mostly yes. i hate the spread of misinformation. that and i'm looking into getting an '86 4000 CS
Not worth the time...

At least this is slightly more plausible than the CS forums guy beating an M3 and X5M...
Old 07-27-2011, 06:32 AM
  #27  
AudiWorld Member
 
Crucible35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1990CamaroRS
so basically, you're saying you outran a intake/tune/catback L99 Camaro with around 340-350bhp. if it was a stock L99 i could possibly see it, as long as he was spinning through 2nd and 3rd gear. he has 50-60bhp (stock) on you, and only weighs about 100lbs more.

oh yes, i forgot though, he has bolt-ons. which the LS motors take to like a fat kid to cake. not to mention the tune which deactivates torque management, which he should then be around 370-380rwhp and 390-400rwtq. so i'm sorry, either he wasn't in it all the way, or you're bsing.
Who cares.....the new (and the old for that matter)Camaro's are damn fugly! Welcome to AW!
Old 10-20-2011, 04:19 AM
  #28  
AudiWorld Member
 
OzzyLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UV 1 Million Florida
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUA77R0
VIDEO! ...or it never happened.

And it was not an SS...unless the driver didn't know what the 3rd pedal was for.... a Camaro LT, now that I could believe... that would put him at around 300 hp... An SS has over 425 hp. No way an A4, even with a K04 and your other listed mods even comes close to 360hp.

Maybe he put some SS badges on... but doesn't sound like it was an SS to me.

If you're in the L.A. area, I'll be happy to loan you a professional mount for a video camera.
+1

My other, other, other car is a Camaro SS
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vinb8
A4 (B8 Platform) Discussion
6
05-27-2011 01:23 PM
che420
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
11
11-15-2002 03:41 PM
Blitzkrieg
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
42
01-22-2002 12:02 PM



Quick Reply: modded 2010 a4 b8 k04 vs modded 2010 camaro ss auto



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:20 PM.