2015 vs. 2016 A6 Prestige
The following users liked this post:
urs6_ma (02-19-2023)
01-25-2019, 04:20 PM
#13
AudiWorld Super User
This thread is quite entertaining. 
01-26-2019, 03:18 AM
#14
AudiWorld Super User
As far as Audizine is concerned, it certainly is a busier site; my one observation being that it is populated by a lot of boy racers who spend much of their time (and money apparently) upgrading with Stage 1's and Stage 2's and every other bell and whistle they can find to eke more oomph from their car. That's all well and good if it's your thing but I find more sober discussion on this site, albeit a bit slower in arriving.
01-27-2019, 05:43 AM
#16
AudiWorld Member
Make it three. Much harder to find just C7/A6 info there. To many other models included in one section.
Last edited by ByByBMW; 01-27-2019 at 05:54 AM.
01-27-2019, 02:08 PM
#17
AudiWorld Member
I also prefer the styling of the 15', and at first regretted getting the 16' even with all of the upgrades. But now I'm grateful I didn't go for the 15'. The power increase (3.0T) is alone worth it, and of course all of the tech upgrades make a big, big difference. However, I never, ever use the map display on the cockpit display, it's just too small and awkward to look at when you're driving. And you'll definitely want to go with the 3.0T over the 2.0T. That's a no brainer. If you're stuck on getting a Prestige over a Premium Plus then be aware that there's a lot more to go wrong, to break, to be serviced, and four wheel alignments are going to cost at least twice as much with the Prestige. That being said, I do kinda wish I had the HUD, and the seats on the Prestige are much, much more comfortable.
01-27-2019, 02:15 PM
#18
AudiWorld Senior Member
02-08-2019, 07:18 PM
#19
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm in a similar situation as the OP. From 2012 to 2015, were there any significant changes worth considering during that period?
And my other concern is the carbon build up issue. Was anything updated with the 2016 3.0 to help with this problem? I thought I read somewhere that manufacturers were going to dual fuel injectors to solve this, one in the cylinder head and a second in the intake tract.
And regarding the bump in horsepower, is the difference that discernible?
Thanks!
And my other concern is the carbon build up issue. Was anything updated with the 2016 3.0 to help with this problem? I thought I read somewhere that manufacturers were going to dual fuel injectors to solve this, one in the cylinder head and a second in the intake tract.
And regarding the bump in horsepower, is the difference that discernible?
Thanks!
02-11-2019, 04:59 AM
#20
AudiWorld Member
I'm in a similar situation as the OP. From 2012 to 2015, were there any significant changes worth considering during that period?
And my other concern is the carbon build up issue. Was anything updated with the 2016 3.0 to help with this problem? I thought I read somewhere that manufacturers were going to dual fuel injectors to solve this, one in the cylinder head and a second in the intake tract.
And regarding the bump in horsepower, is the difference that discernible?
Thanks!
And my other concern is the carbon build up issue. Was anything updated with the 2016 3.0 to help with this problem? I thought I read somewhere that manufacturers were going to dual fuel injectors to solve this, one in the cylinder head and a second in the intake tract.
And regarding the bump in horsepower, is the difference that discernible?
Thanks!