A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C5 Audi A6 and S6 produced from 1998-2004

BG44K or Chevron Techron...What's better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2003, 06:52 AM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
99-A6Q/Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default BG44K or Chevron Techron...What's better?

Which one is better to use on my 99 A6?
I hear mixed reviews....want some other opinions

Thanks
Old 01-07-2003, 07:39 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Muhammad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BG 44K
Old 01-07-2003, 07:53 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
ar2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I understand that both are good, but I know the Techron stuff works.

I've had no experience with the BG44K. What doesn't work is the run-of-the-mill stuff like STP or Wynns.
Old 01-07-2003, 08:05 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
DWC_2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default BG44 is excellent but expensive

I first learned of BG44 when I used to 4-wheel. Many serious offroaders use it because their engines tend to carbon up from so much low speed time. Guys who did serious engine mods swore by it for virtually eliminating carbon build up.

The best method is to find a shop that offers the BG44 treatment via their proprietary system that uses more concentrated solution and works like a flushing unit. Last time I did it (5 yrs ago?) it cost about $75 (SoCal). Dumping it in the gas tank is much less efficient and probably much more expensive in the long run.
Old 01-07-2003, 08:42 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
phred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Techron didn't help me

I still needed to have the carbon blown out of my 2.8Q at every service, even whilst using Mobil, Chevron and 76 gasoline which are all supposed to be full of detergents and putting in additional Techron.
Old 01-07-2003, 09:57 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
ar2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default You're correct, the direct injection method the dealers use is much more effective...

than dumping the stuff into the fuel tank. I understand that the 5-valve engines are easily carboned-up from continuous low-speed, low-rpm operation.

Independent shops also perform this service.
Old 01-07-2003, 10:10 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Muhammad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, direct injection FI cleaning is the ONLY WAY TO GO. =)
Old 01-07-2003, 11:16 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Stoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like mixture isn't right. Wonder if MAF might be borderline.
Old 01-07-2003, 01:13 PM
  #9  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
99-A6Q/Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: BG44 is excellent but expensive

expensive meaning damaging to the car or expensive by buying so many cans to clean the FI out?

Thanks
Old 01-07-2003, 02:24 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Muhammad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's about $30/can vs $6/can for Techron.


Quick Reply: BG44K or Chevron Techron...What's better?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:35 AM.