Radar Detector
#31
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#33
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Residential neighborhoods/suburbs are 25mph unless otherwise posted, this was taken from the arizona MVD driving manual.
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
In any case, I live in Ontario, radar deterctors are illegal, and I don't own one.
#34
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[QUOTE=GTA_Driver: In any case, I live in Ontario, radar deterctors are illegal, and I don't own one.[/QUOTE]
I thought your cops still ride horses, so you can out run them yes. LOL!
I thought your cops still ride horses, so you can out run them yes. LOL!
#35
#37
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
#38
AudiWorld Super User
#39
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
wrong. optional means that there is no consequence if you dont follow them. there are ALWAYS consequences for breaking the law. just because you get away with it once doesn't mean it is consequence free. you are predicating your argument on the basis that actions in void of consequences make the underlying law optional, when in fact that is incorrect. part of being in a law abiding society is that you follow the laws BECAUSE there are consequences. if laws were truely optional to follow no one would and there would be anarchy, which in and of itself could be considered a consequence.
#40
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
wrong. optional means that there is no consequence if you dont follow them. there are ALWAYS consequences for breaking the law. just because you get away with it once doesn't mean it is consequence free. you are predicating your argument on the basis that actions in void of consequences make the underlying law optional, when in fact that is incorrect. part of being in a law abiding society is that you follow the laws BECAUSE there are consequences. if laws were truely optional to follow no one would and there would be anarchy, which in and of itself could be considered a consequence.