A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C5 Audi A6 and S6 produced from 1998-2004

A Reply to Potomac2.7T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2005, 09:00 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
John J Szobocsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default A Reply to Potomac2.7T

I decided to post a new thread to reply to your comments regarding Audi and Volkswagen. You are correct that by 1991 the influence of Piech was strongly felt in Audi design. Piech began his career in the mid-1960s with Porsche. He was in charge of engine development of the legendary 917! In the early 1970's his grandfather, Ferry Porsche, decided that he did not want the family involved in the family business so Piech was sent packing. He became Vice Chairman of Audi NSU AutoUnion in 1975. At Audi he was responsible for the development of quattro, the five cylinder engine and the aerodyanmic Audi 100 (also known as the 5000 in the States). Yes, this was the car that caused the unintended acceleration scare. Piech was Chairman of Audi at the time and appears to be the one responsible for the tardy response in the U.S. market. Piech promoted motorsports at Audi and is directly responsible for its rallying and Trans AM successes.

Piech developed the Audi brand virtually from the ground up. In 1993 he was promoted to Chairman of the entire Volkswagen Audi Group until his retirement in 2002. An interesting book about Piech and other auto executives is "Six Men Who Built the Modern Auto Industry" by Richard A. Johnson. I highly recommend it.

The Piech influence will be felt at Audi and VW for years to come. Piech was responsible for the platform approach taken by the group. Several analysts have derided the platform approach but the economics made Vag a stronger player in the international markets. Piech's predecessor, Carl Hahn, promoted mass production of a handful of designs. The Golf plant at Wolfsburg had a break-even point at 105% utilization!

The car industry has changed dramatically with the Korean and Chinese entering the world market. VW needs to become Audi and Audi needs to change to a more sporting platform to survive. This is a very difficult task as Audi needs to avoid disenchantment among the current customer base.

I can ramble on for a while but I will stop here.

Cordially,

John J. Szobocsan
Old 06-02-2005, 09:10 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
phred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default But since Piech was only human

he also created the Phaeton and gave it to VW.
Old 06-02-2005, 09:12 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Rick 601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im not Potomac2.7T but thanks anyway- feel free to ramble on!
Old 06-02-2005, 10:17 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 21,851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Thanks for the history, and I agree with your final assessment.

I just hope that VW management gets the long term support and consistency to follow through. Too often the mission gets compromised, resulting in wasted effort and tarnished brands.

I support VWs move into Audi territory, and Audi's move into BMW/Porsche territory.
Old 06-02-2005, 10:18 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 21,851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think the PhA8ton is where VW wants to be in 5 or 10 years. It was just 2 much 2 soon.
Old 06-02-2005, 11:17 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
John J Szobocsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default I agree with your statement...

but we need to remember that the Phaeton is the new Bentley platform. Audi is able to justify the expense of a bespoke platform for the the A8 (basic architectural structures including suspension and drivetrain are shared with VW and Bentley)but Bentley's much smaller sales volumes do not. This was the problem with Rolls-Royce/Bentley and the reason why Vickers put the company up for sale. The costs of developing a new vehicle, in light of market and regulatory demands, is incredibly high. Vickers did not have the capital reserves to make the necessary investment in the motor car division; therefore, the decision was made to sell the unit.

Volkswagen, using the strength of its balance sheet, and engineering resources is able to inject the much needed capital into Bentley. Bentley today is one of the fastest growing nameplates. The Phaeton,on the other hand, and its glass factory in Dresden, represents the future of VW. The Phaeton, while viewed as a money pit, provides VW with knowledge on how to transition out of the mass market production-based world into the niche product world. One should visit VW's micro website on the glass factory. It is really amazing and shows the investment being made by Vag in advanced manufacturing capabilities!

The very economics of automobile production counters much movement into advanced technologies. The costs of having a technology fail in the field is much too great. Recall the issues facing Vag and the faulty ignition coils. Volume producers, if they want to innovate, need to incorporate advanced technologies in low volume, niche products to make the cost economics attractive for mass production and to learn of the technology's limitations. Audi introduced laser seam welding on the TT and Vag has since introduced this manufacturing concept in more pedestrian products including the VW Golf. The higher costs, and lower volumes, of the TT made this technology possible for introduction into the Golf. Laser seam welding increases the rigidity of the body shell at a minimal weight gain when compared to spot welding.

Cordially,

John J. Szobocsan
Old 06-02-2005, 11:40 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 21,851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Reading your posts within minutes of the nOOb "I wans to get my turbbos to faster" posts...

... is giving me whiplash. Such clarity and knowledge contrasted with... the opposite.
Old 06-02-2005, 11:52 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Jmacs4.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol!
Old 06-02-2005, 06:01 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
April's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 52,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Heh, heh
Old 06-02-2005, 06:04 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
April's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 52,918
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Piech was an engineer who loved to design stuff - sometimes without

even having a niche to which to properly apply it. He also had a large ego. Sometimes that is great for the company/project, and sometimes it leads to a bottleneck of design and engineering ideas when he's trying to be the boss of a huge company, and the lead engineer.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phuzib@gmail.com
Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 Coupe & Cabrio (B8)
0
06-18-2013 09:03 AM
iamaudi.com
S4 (B6 & B7 Platforms) Discussion
0
08-25-2009 11:04 AM
Jason Teller
Audi News Forum
1
12-20-2005 04:23 AM
April
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
2
03-21-2005 01:36 PM



Quick Reply: A Reply to Potomac2.7T



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 AM.