A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C6 Audi A6 produced from 2004-present and Audi S6 produced from 2007 - 2011

2010 A6 CR's most relaible Audi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2009, 11:42 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default 2010 A6 CR's most relaible Audi

According to the Consumer Reports Annual Car Reliability Survey 2010, the Audi A6 V6 is the most reliable Audi in the line up. The worst is the Q7.
Attached Images  

Last edited by The G Man; 10-27-2009 at 11:45 AM.
Old 10-27-2009, 11:58 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
jazznuts699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is predicted reliability based on past reliability data... or something else... i dont quite get how for example mercury is #10 while ford is #16 and lincoln is #20...they generally use the same parts.... with some trim differences...

on another note being 24th out of 33... that's not really something to jump up and down about... but thats just me hehe ~ i still luv my audi
Old 10-27-2009, 01:00 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Member
 
ex_boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jazznuts699
is predicted reliability based on past reliability data... or something else... i dont quite get how for example mercury is #10 while ford is #16 and lincoln is #20...they generally use the same parts.... with some trim differences...
Unlike Ford, Mercury doesn't have any trucks or large SUV's in their lineup. Those are typically the worst in reliability, so that would create the disparity.

Not sure why the Lincolns are scoring low, except for the Navigator and they may be trying to put too many bells and whistles on their lineup. That's part of what is killing Audi... complex things break more often.
Old 10-27-2009, 03:13 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
jazznuts699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ex_boxster
...complex things break more often.
true true
Old 10-27-2009, 04:25 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
am_ver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NorCal, USA
Posts: 1,478
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ex_boxster
complex things break more often.
+1; I hate the EPB
Old 10-28-2009, 07:37 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Keep in mind, this is consumer report we are talking about. They are good at recommanding toaster ovens, but not cars
Old 10-29-2009, 11:30 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
ex_boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Keep in mind, this is consumer report we are talking about. They are good at recommanding toaster ovens, but not cars
Then why'd you post it?

Seriously, I wouldn't look to CR for performance car recommendation, but for reliability ratings and real-world impressions, they are better than most. After all, the car rags all rely on advertising money to stay alive, and their test vehicles are almost always hand picked and provided by the manufacturer. Are they going to bite the hand that feeds them? Not likely.

At least CR buys real cars off the lot (not ringers), and they don't take advertisements. If something is crap, they'll tell you it's crap... it won't cost them a dime to do so. Their reliability ratings come from real people that actually own the cars. It's a good resource.

Here's a good article:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...2886/index.htm
Old 10-29-2009, 11:56 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ex_boxster
Their reliability ratings come from real people that actually own the cars. It's a good resource.
And that is the biggest problem with CR, some sample size are too small. CR is suppose to have a minimum of 100 data sample before they consider the data valid. For the 2009 survey, I believe 1.3 million CR subscriber respond to their survey, yet some sample size were in the hundreds and some are in the tens of thousands. My problem with this type of method is that the weight of each survey is not equal, meaning one person who have a negative option of a low sample model car can change the final result much more than a person who is evaluating a car with a massive sample weight. This year CR actually broke their own rules by using sample rate below 100 for 3 of Ford's model.
Old 10-29-2009, 01:11 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Member
 
ex_boxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
And that is the biggest problem with CR, some sample size are too small. CR is suppose to have a minimum of 100 data sample before they consider the data valid. For the 2009 survey, I believe 1.3 million CR subscriber respond to their survey, yet some sample size were in the hundreds and some are in the tens of thousands. My problem with this type of method is that the weight of each survey is not equal, meaning one person who have a negative option of a low sample model car can change the final result much more than a person who is evaluating a car with a massive sample weight. This year CR actually broke their own rules by using sample rate below 100 for 3 of Ford's model.
While I agree that the variation in sample sizes isn't ideal, it not as much of a problem as you indicate. The reliability ratings don't come from someone saying "I don't really like the brakes", they come from people checking a box that indicates the brakes have required service on some particular model car. While someone can lie about problems and skew the results, that can happen in both directions, good and bad.

If Brand X's sedan has really bad brakes so that about 25% of them experience brake failure in the first year, a sample size of 100 should have about 25 failure reports, just like a sample size of 1000 should have around 250 bad reports. Will the larger sample be more accurate? Of course. But that doesn't mean the smaller sample is insignificant, it's just not as accurate. And since the data is represented in ranges of quality over years of time it does show trends, which is the real strength of the ratings IMO.

In the end, cars are usually an emotional choice, not a practical one. If not, we'd all be driving Accords, huh?
Old 10-30-2009, 11:04 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
mystrodo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NW USA
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The key word *Predicted* IMO, the 3.2 and 4.2 and now the 3.0 (3.2 that's been beefed for the supercharger) if you took away the issues beginner users have and complain about such as understanding the complexity of the car, they are always taking them in because they can'l figure out how to pair their phones or how to use the MMI or one day while I was in how to open the glove box etc etc..I'd rate the machanicals of the C6 as one of the most reliable when serviced properly.

The perfect car will be the car you never have to learn anything about.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sampita
New Member Welcome Area
2
04-28-2015 10:00 AM
Jason Teller
Audi News Forum
0
01-10-2006 07:56 PM
no.radar
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
9
08-17-2004 05:56 PM
AUDI2000MOD
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
1
11-09-2003 07:47 PM
neilm
Misc. Models Discussion
0
02-27-1999 12:57 PM



Quick Reply: 2010 A6 CR's most relaible Audi



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 AM.