A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the C6 Audi A6 produced from 2004-present and Audi S6 produced from 2007 - 2011

Performance Modifications?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2006, 08:59 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Dabney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Performance Modifications?

Hey guys,

I have a 3.2 A6 and was wondering if there are any companies making intakes, exhaust, suspension, etc. for our cars yet? Thanks so much.
Old 07-21-2006, 04:42 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
markcincinnati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,500
Received 42 Likes on 28 Posts
Default Re: Performance Modifications and Dreams to keep dreaming. . .

There are springsets and anti-sway bars (and probably struts, too.)

I have not seen anything in the way of mod availability that will improve (or be worth the cost, better said) the HP and torque -- makes you long for the Audi A6 3.2T (now that could have been easily a 300HP engine with plenty mo torque -- and it coulda been chipped!)

Funny Audi eschews the Bi-turbo, meanwhile BMW ups the ante on their "255HP" 6 by ADDing a turbo.

Of course, as we may recall from the days of the 2.7T bi-turbo, it was quicker even in automatic trim than the 4.2 non turbo also in automatic trim.

I bought the 4.2, which I did love, in a 2000 and a 2001 A6. Then I got a 2.7T allroad with a stick shift in 2003.

Blew my mind to have this hot rod station wagon with but a mere V6 that seemed with only the addition of sport BPV's to pull so much stronger than the previous 4.2's.

Some one here once wrote that the A6 3.2 was never meant to replace the 2.7T, but the entry level 3.0 NA. Of course the price of the 3.2 seems dead on the outgoing Sline 2.7T in 2004.

Somewhere, some factory skunk works must've done the Audi bi-turbo treatment on the 3.2.

The damn thing probably showed the normally aspirated 4.2 its tail lights time and again, probably -- in FSI guise -- bettered the mileage of the then non-FSI 4.2, weighed less and sounded nearly as sweet.

The additional cost of the turbo plumbing would probably have made it able to be priced lower than the 4.2, too.

It wouldn't do, however, NOT to offer the A6 with a V8 even if a street superior V6T could have been brought to market for a few thousand dollars less.

Ahhhhhhhhh - marketing!

Wouldn't it play hell in the market if BMW takes the 3.0siT and puts it into a 530xi -- AND allows it to be had with a 6 speed stick?

And prices it south, pretty far south of the 5 series V8?

Dream a little dream for me.

Of course the best dream is to add the T to the 3.2. . . .
Old 07-25-2006, 12:06 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
ACSGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Don't forget that the Roadjet has the normally aspirated 3.2 FSI, but rated at 300 bhp

Looks like Audi is switching places with BMW.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chewym
Audi A5 / S5 / RS5 Coupe & Cabrio (B8)
1
04-19-2009 03:59 PM
markcincinnati
A6 / S6 (C6 Platform) Discussion
7
01-11-2007 10:17 PM
K2audi
Audi allroad
3
10-12-2005 09:30 AM
Mark
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
1
01-22-2000 02:10 PM
steve
Misc. Models Discussion
4
02-06-1999 01:25 PM



Quick Reply: Performance Modifications?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM.