S6 SLOWER than A6 2012 3.0
#1
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
S6 become slower than new A6 2012 3.0T
Fenomenal numbers for new A6. I am surprised. Not too far from M5 numbers.
Here video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7kvLxcpg0s
Fenomenal numbers for new A6. I am surprised. Not too far from M5 numbers.
Here video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7kvLxcpg0s
#2
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: new jersey
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
S6 become slower than new A6 2012 3.0T
Fenomenal numbers for new A6. I am surprised. Not too far from M5 numbers.
Here video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7kvLxcpg0s
Fenomenal numbers for new A6. I am surprised. Not too far from M5 numbers.
Here video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7kvLxcpg0s
#3
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
2. Where is official info about this car lap time in nurburgring?
P.S. Dont forget that it is 3.0 basic engine model
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
New BMW 550 have alot bigger engine, but numbers are aproximetly the same
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#4
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: new jersey
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
7:55 NURBURGRING M5 read all over the BMW forums THE A6 WILL BE 830+ the 4.4 time is bmws release, audi release of the A6 is 5.3 go to audiusa.com if you dont believe me. (BMW is always conservative.) that alone is .9 seconds which 0 to 60 is a slaughter. if you read M5 reviews they acknowledge that the 0 to 60 will more than likely be 4 or 4.1 seconds. again stick to comparing to the audi S brand . the audi rs brand always loses to the bmw M brand.so why would you try to compare an A6 to an M5? compare it to the 5 series but not M. i do own an Audi A5 cabrio and as you guessed a M3 sedan.
Last edited by bobbyd1961; 06-30-2011 at 02:46 PM. Reason: spelling
#5
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The biggest change to the 2012 BMW M5 is the switch from a high-revving V10 engine to a 4.4-liter twin-turbocharged V8 that pumps out 552 hp in European trim, making the M5 the most powerful production sedan ever created by BMW’s M division. The motor is shared by the X6M and X5M high-performance SUVs.
Mated to a 7-speed dual clutch transmission (rumor has it a manual is on the way, too) the M5 is good for a 0-60 mph time of 4.4 seconds, thanks to a healthy 502 lb-ft of torque.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/...#ixzz1QnzNP6a6
Mated to a 7-speed dual clutch transmission (rumor has it a manual is on the way, too) the M5 is good for a 0-60 mph time of 4.4 seconds, thanks to a healthy 502 lb-ft of torque.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/...#ixzz1QnzNP6a6
#6
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The biggest change to the 2012 BMW M5 is the switch from a high-revving V10 engine to a 4.4-liter twin-turbocharged V8 that pumps out 552 hp in European trim, making the M5 the most powerful production sedan ever created by BMW’s M division. The motor is shared by the X6M and X5M high-performance SUVs.
Mated to a 7-speed dual clutch transmission (rumor has it a manual is on the way, too) the M5 is good for a 0-60 mph time of 4.4 seconds, thanks to a healthy 502 lb-ft of torque.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/...#ixzz1QnzNP6a6
Mated to a 7-speed dual clutch transmission (rumor has it a manual is on the way, too) the M5 is good for a 0-60 mph time of 4.4 seconds, thanks to a healthy 502 lb-ft of torque.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/...#ixzz1QnzNP6a6
#7
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: new jersey
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i agree it should have been 3.8 at least. i did want under 8 at nurburgring but wanted around a 745. why would i pay 40000 more for an M5 when it is the same as specs as the M3 sedan? they both seat 5. answer is I WONT.
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)