Tires balding on outside
#21
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Circa 2007 in the US newer labeling rules came in for US cars. Driven by the Explorer roll over debacle. The newer stickers are the white ones, with black, yellow and red elements that have to be on the driver's door jamb. Earlier they were more commonly on the fuel tank lid on Audi's, though sometimes elsewhere. Thus on D3 A8's, there will be some of both; on S8's I think they are just the new ones.
The relevance is under the "new rules" manufacturers often raised the pressures yet further to comply with the underlying tighter rules on load testing and heat related issues--again, think lowest common denominator here with things like Explorers with high aspect ratios, smaller wheel sizes, heavy chassis weights, and top heavy to start. I first saw the issue more clearly when posters on the Phaeton and other various low volume VW's happened to notice changes in the settings from one year to the next, and one market to the next. Post U.S. stickering change seemed to be the most common element in common. Meanwhile, since my Audi has the pre-2007 sticker with the range of pressures depending on exact tire fitment and load and passenger count being carried, I buy into it more than the newer stickers that have been tweaked for Explorer type lowest common denominators.
The relevance is under the "new rules" manufacturers often raised the pressures yet further to comply with the underlying tighter rules on load testing and heat related issues--again, think lowest common denominator here with things like Explorers with high aspect ratios, smaller wheel sizes, heavy chassis weights, and top heavy to start. I first saw the issue more clearly when posters on the Phaeton and other various low volume VW's happened to notice changes in the settings from one year to the next, and one market to the next. Post U.S. stickering change seemed to be the most common element in common. Meanwhile, since my Audi has the pre-2007 sticker with the range of pressures depending on exact tire fitment and load and passenger count being carried, I buy into it more than the newer stickers that have been tweaked for Explorer type lowest common denominators.
#22
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have no clue what you are trying to say. What I meant is that shallow tires are fashion and that they are killing all components of performance in addition to ride quality.
Yes Camber. I should fire my spelling checker. As per the rest of this quote I must say again that I do not understand. I know all terms and words, but still... And yes, I know where the steering rack is. I think that it is matter of space. To use rack and pinion steering on a front engine mounted in front of the front axle this was their only choice.
By the way, A8's upper and lower links are of a very similar length what makes Camber pretty constant. It doesn't change with height. Not for much for sure.
I can say that your old and mine old are not at the same page. Forty years ago most European cars had independent rear suspension that had to be aligned. At that ancient times I raced NSU TT (made in the very same factory where A8's are made today) and Fiat Abarth 1000TC. It`s easy to Google them. You Tube may be even better since they are still raced. Today I am racing Formula 1 on my Sharp TV, if that was serious question.
Yes Camber. I should fire my spelling checker. As per the rest of this quote I must say again that I do not understand. I know all terms and words, but still... And yes, I know where the steering rack is. I think that it is matter of space. To use rack and pinion steering on a front engine mounted in front of the front axle this was their only choice.
By the way, A8's upper and lower links are of a very similar length what makes Camber pretty constant. It doesn't change with height. Not for much for sure.
I can say that your old and mine old are not at the same page. Forty years ago most European cars had independent rear suspension that had to be aligned. At that ancient times I raced NSU TT (made in the very same factory where A8's are made today) and Fiat Abarth 1000TC. It`s easy to Google them. You Tube may be even better since they are still raced. Today I am racing Formula 1 on my Sharp TV, if that was serious question.
racing tires are designed to actually deform fast and reshape slow for surface contact and traction, if they lost contact in a turn it can be catastrophic for the car/driver/s and the sport in general.
However those tires are designed to not last more than 200km if use longer than that they lost their abilities of adhesion.
there's other choices for the steering rack as you can see on newer audis, the rack is at the bottom, at which point is not affected by height as much as earlier cars, the reason why is that with this set-up the rack and the lower ball joints stay at the same geometrical angle compared to the upper set-up where the rack moves with the upper arms and by the angle of the shock/strut it changes the toe inclination and affects the camber positive or negative depending which way the height is adjusted.
By the way, A8's upper and lower links are of a very similar length what makes Camber pretty constant. It doesn't change with height. Not for much for sure.
there's nothing constant on these arms, upper and lower, each arm performs an specific function on managing the suspension angles requested by weight applied and turning angle required by the driver.
remember in equal "A" arm suspension there's only one upper and one lower ball joint at each side, with Audi we have 4 at each side and they actually overlap each other sideways, both upper and lowers.
that means when you turn the steering on "A" arms they just rotate in their own axis vs here one moves inward and the other outer to help tilt the wheel.
the 40 years common was based on the fact that things didn't move that fast then when it came to commercial technology, considering those were some of the best years in engineering.
however later in time with the aid of computers advancements became so huge and fast at every level.
and believe am just as old when it comes to cars, but most of my experience was on the BMW 2002,3.0. BENZ 450,280. jaguar xke, MG (mechanized garbage), some peugeots, renaults, and i as you miss some of the fiats, lancias and alfas. My earliest Audi I work on was the 100ls,(onboard brake rotors, good times)was in the middle of the unintended acceleration and even was interviewed by one of the major newspapers (never published,probably because they didn't like that I actually defended the car and compared to the bmws and benzes at the time having the same issue).
my first car was COUPE GT,(the memories), more audis than I can count with fingers thru the years.
never actually left the product but like anybody else had to make a living so went to BMW and BENZ at different times.
When the news were released about The A4 line-up coming to the States I was personally invited by the owner of one of the premier Porsche Audi dealerships in LA to joint the team, without hesitation jump on it in may of 1995.
16 years later Am proud to claim ownership of the largest Audi independent shop in LA, which with the help and encouragement of my wife and son we build from scratch and continue to grow thanks to the loyalty of my customers which is never taken for granted.
Last edited by s4master1; 04-14-2011 at 10:02 PM. Reason: pictures
#23
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think that lost of contact in a turn is way more catastrophic for an average family than for any racing driver.
However those tires are designed to not last more than 200km if use longer than that they lost their abilities of adhesion.
there's other choices for the steering rack as you can see on newer audis, the rack is at the bottom, at which point is not affected by height as much as earlier cars, the reason why is that with this set-up the rack and the lower ball joints stay at the same geometrical angle compared to the upper set-up where the rack moves with the upper arms and by the angle of the shock/strut it changes the toe inclination and affects the camber positive or negative depending which way the height is adjusted.
there's nothing constant on these arms, upper and lower, each arm performs an specific function on managing the suspension angles requested by weight applied and turning angle required by the driver.
remember in equal "A" arm suspension there's only one upper and one lower ball joint at each side, with Audi we have 4 at each side and they actually overlap each other sideways, both upper and lowers.
that means when you turn the steering on "A" arms they just rotate in their own axis vs here one moves inward and the other outer to help tilt the wheel.
remember in equal "A" arm suspension there's only one upper and one lower ball joint at each side, with Audi we have 4 at each side and they actually overlap each other sideways, both upper and lowers.
that means when you turn the steering on "A" arms they just rotate in their own axis vs here one moves inward and the other outer to help tilt the wheel.
the 40 years common was based on the fact that things didn't move that fast then when it came to commercial technology, considering those were some of the best years in engineering.
however later in time with the aid of computers advancements became so huge and fast at every level.
and believe am just as old when it comes to cars, but most of my experience was on the BMW 2002,3.0. BENZ 450,280. jaguar xke, MG (mechanized garbage), some peugeots, renaults, and i as you miss some of the fiats, lancias and alfas. My earliest Audi I work on was the 100ls,(onboard brake rotors, good times)was in the middle of the unintended acceleration and even was interviewed by one of the major newspapers (never published,probably because they didn't like that I actually defended the car and compared to the bmws and benzes at the time having the same issue).
my first car was COUPE GT,(the memories), more audis than I can count with fingers thru the years.
never actually left the product but like anybody else had to make a living so went to BMW and BENZ at different times.
When the news were released about The A4 line-up coming to the States I was personally invited by the owner of one of the premier Porsche Audi dealerships in LA to joint the team, without hesitation jump on it in may of 1995.
16 years later Am proud to claim ownership of the largest Audi independent shop in LA, which with the help and encouragement of my wife and son we build from scratch and continue to grow thanks to the loyalty of my customers which is never taken for granted.
however later in time with the aid of computers advancements became so huge and fast at every level.
and believe am just as old when it comes to cars, but most of my experience was on the BMW 2002,3.0. BENZ 450,280. jaguar xke, MG (mechanized garbage), some peugeots, renaults, and i as you miss some of the fiats, lancias and alfas. My earliest Audi I work on was the 100ls,(onboard brake rotors, good times)was in the middle of the unintended acceleration and even was interviewed by one of the major newspapers (never published,probably because they didn't like that I actually defended the car and compared to the bmws and benzes at the time having the same issue).
my first car was COUPE GT,(the memories), more audis than I can count with fingers thru the years.
never actually left the product but like anybody else had to make a living so went to BMW and BENZ at different times.
When the news were released about The A4 line-up coming to the States I was personally invited by the owner of one of the premier Porsche Audi dealerships in LA to joint the team, without hesitation jump on it in may of 1995.
16 years later Am proud to claim ownership of the largest Audi independent shop in LA, which with the help and encouragement of my wife and son we build from scratch and continue to grow thanks to the loyalty of my customers which is never taken for granted.
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#24
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well back ON subject haha.
I upped the psi to 40 all around. Haven't noticed any harsher of a ride, although with the temps still pretty chilly here in michigan, the MMI reads the rear tires hovering around 38-39psi when starting off and the fronts still around 37. But the tires do look pumped up a bit more, and seem to take a bit of the lean off the outside.
I upped the psi to 40 all around. Haven't noticed any harsher of a ride, although with the temps still pretty chilly here in michigan, the MMI reads the rear tires hovering around 38-39psi when starting off and the fronts still around 37. But the tires do look pumped up a bit more, and seem to take a bit of the lean off the outside.
#25
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Apples to apples by all means. "Deform fast and reshape slow" is an interesting concept. How does it work? I mean broken down to some well known lows of physics.
Laws of physics do apply as on just about anything, specially when is something that change speed fast (race car), let's just talk "G" forces and center of gravity on the total mass of the car and tell me where a passenger car even comes close to a f1 for example?
tires deform to gain the shape of the surface they are in contact with to accomplish the most adhesion/traction/braking possible, the word slow is just used by comparison as they reshape quite fast as well.
that's where your opinion about tall tires comes into play and makes perfect sense, with a low profile tire at high "Gs" the car would just spin due to lost of contact/traction, still just because they are tall the driver is not exactly having a comfortable ride.
on a passenger car specially a heavy sedan is prohibitive to accomplish the same acceleration forces as a race car, if this could be possible the tires would just dismount themselves at take off or during a turn.
see your point on looks before functionality makes sense by all means and eventually we all may just start using taller tires due to the condition of most highways.
sorry if I sound too technical but am not, at this point those terms are so well known in the automotive industry that are used so commonly that I don't know any other way,
you can see how cars have evolved over the years, and so are the procedures/tools/equipment to repair them.
just think the reason hunter and other alignment companies went from inches/mm to degrees.
nowadays all angle are measured in degrees. I still remember old guys adjusting suspensions with a string and a level bar, those guys as well the ones that didn't want to give up carburators became dinosaurs as new technology came along.
transitions have always been painful but at the end makes things better/easier more efficient, now is so much easier to be a mechanic than 20 years ago but still basic principles apply as the internal combustion engine is so old is almost laughable that has not really changed.
I never been much of a racing fan or a car guy at all I just believe in doing one thing and doing better than anybody, every year I get 4 free tickets from Porsche for the Long Beach grand prix and never attended, my son however is getting more interested in the sport and we are looking into an internship at the Porsche factory in Germany.
Laws of physics do apply as on just about anything, specially when is something that change speed fast (race car), let's just talk "G" forces and center of gravity on the total mass of the car and tell me where a passenger car even comes close to a f1 for example?
tires deform to gain the shape of the surface they are in contact with to accomplish the most adhesion/traction/braking possible, the word slow is just used by comparison as they reshape quite fast as well.
that's where your opinion about tall tires comes into play and makes perfect sense, with a low profile tire at high "Gs" the car would just spin due to lost of contact/traction, still just because they are tall the driver is not exactly having a comfortable ride.
on a passenger car specially a heavy sedan is prohibitive to accomplish the same acceleration forces as a race car, if this could be possible the tires would just dismount themselves at take off or during a turn.
see your point on looks before functionality makes sense by all means and eventually we all may just start using taller tires due to the condition of most highways.
sorry if I sound too technical but am not, at this point those terms are so well known in the automotive industry that are used so commonly that I don't know any other way,
you can see how cars have evolved over the years, and so are the procedures/tools/equipment to repair them.
just think the reason hunter and other alignment companies went from inches/mm to degrees.
nowadays all angle are measured in degrees. I still remember old guys adjusting suspensions with a string and a level bar, those guys as well the ones that didn't want to give up carburators became dinosaurs as new technology came along.
transitions have always been painful but at the end makes things better/easier more efficient, now is so much easier to be a mechanic than 20 years ago but still basic principles apply as the internal combustion engine is so old is almost laughable that has not really changed.
I never been much of a racing fan or a car guy at all I just believe in doing one thing and doing better than anybody, every year I get 4 free tickets from Porsche for the Long Beach grand prix and never attended, my son however is getting more interested in the sport and we are looking into an internship at the Porsche factory in Germany.
#26
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Based on this and the other tire thread I went to 40 all around too.
Ride is fine, slightly more noticeable on badly bumpy roads.
Steering is a lot crisper.
More importantly it may help prolong the life of expensive tires.
Ride is fine, slightly more noticeable on badly bumpy roads.
Steering is a lot crisper.
More importantly it may help prolong the life of expensive tires.
Well back ON subject haha.
I upped the psi to 40 all around. Haven't noticed any harsher of a ride, although with the temps still pretty chilly here in michigan, the MMI reads the rear tires hovering around 38-39psi when starting off and the fronts still around 37. But the tires do look pumped up a bit more, and seem to take a bit of the lean off the outside.
I upped the psi to 40 all around. Haven't noticed any harsher of a ride, although with the temps still pretty chilly here in michigan, the MMI reads the rear tires hovering around 38-39psi when starting off and the fronts still around 37. But the tires do look pumped up a bit more, and seem to take a bit of the lean off the outside.
#27
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
tires deform to gain the shape of the surface they are in contact with to accomplish the most adhesion/traction/braking possible, the word slow is just used by comparison as they reshape quite fast as well.
that's where your opinion about tall tires comes into play and makes perfect sense, with a low profile tire at high "Gs" the car would just spin due to lost of contact/traction, still just because they are tall the driver is not exactly having a comfortable ride.
that's where your opinion about tall tires comes into play and makes perfect sense, with a low profile tire at high "Gs" the car would just spin due to lost of contact/traction, still just because they are tall the driver is not exactly having a comfortable ride.
on a passenger car specially a heavy sedan is prohibitive to accomplish the same acceleration forces as a race car, if this could be possible the tires would just dismount themselves at take off or during a turn.
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I still remember old guys adjusting suspensions with a string and a level bar, those guys as well the ones that didn't want to give up carburators became dinosaurs as new technology came along.
transitions have always been painful but at the end makes things better/easier more efficient, now is so much easier to be a mechanic than 20 years ago but still basic principles apply as the internal combustion engine is so old is almost laughable that has not really changed.
transitions have always been painful but at the end makes things better/easier more efficient, now is so much easier to be a mechanic than 20 years ago but still basic principles apply as the internal combustion engine is so old is almost laughable that has not really changed.
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I never been much of a racing fan or a car guy at all I just believe in doing one thing and doing better than anybody, every year I get 4 free tickets from Porsche for the Long Beach grand prix and never attended, my son however is getting more interested in the sport and we are looking into an internship at the Porsche factory in Germany.
#28
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/guru2.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yesterday I aligned my wheels. Both fronts and rears were too closed. Guy (very experienced but not familiar with A8) Told me so before he even started, by just looking along both sides and touching tires. I didn't tell him that I found the same myself. Can't say that I feel any difference, but I hope tires will.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Baloo588
A8 / S8 (D3 Platform) Discussion
9
09-16-2008 10:44 AM
My tires have been wearing more on the outside, could this be an alignment issue?Dealer says its ok.
maaliish
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
7
08-09-2001 10:33 AM