Broken timing belt doesn't always mean busted valves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2003, 07:31 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
stevenmurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Broken timing belt doesn't always mean busted valves

I was reading some of the recent post and associated web pages on timing belt replacement. Some of them said broken timing belt can result in piston to valve collisions.
I'm pretty sure this is not the case with the 2144cc 5cyl in the older coupes. The engines just have enough internal clearance so the stuff wont touch even if the belt breaks.
Maybe as the compression ratios started creeping up at about 1985 the piston / valve collisions became possible. Does anyone know for sure if any of the 5 cylinder motors are at risk of serious damage if the belt breaks.
steve
Old 03-07-2003, 09:07 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
CGTBrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I researched the NG engine, info was sketchy. I repaced it on speculation.
Old 03-07-2003, 09:44 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Chris in VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2.2 = non-interference

It's the 8.5-1 compression engine and shouldn't destroy the engine if the belt breaks. The 2.3 on the other hand is a 10-1 and may do damage.
Old 03-07-2003, 11:02 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Nervikterklieb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 2.2 = non-interference... afraid not.

it's interference... trust me.
Old 03-08-2003, 05:50 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Whitjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gibsonville, NC
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone know how this applys to 1.8ltr 4 cyls?
Old 03-08-2003, 09:52 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
gmbchef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

10v turbo motors=interference....N/A I5 motors=non-interference
Old 03-08-2003, 12:07 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Jeff Doble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think 4cyl models have interference motors
Old 03-08-2003, 02:24 PM
  #8  
Member
 
StormChaser404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not all N/A I5s are non-interferance...NF and NF ARE interferance...
Old 03-08-2003, 08:44 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Kidquattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dudley, MA
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I think they are

I'm pretty sure the 4cyl are interference. I seen an A4 bend a valve due to a bad tensionor. Though Audi's don't tank like VW's due. You can tell if you damaged a valve on an Audi it won't run that well cold. Once it warms up its fine. VW on the other hand, and i know from first hand experience on a 16v scirocco, timing belt breaks, bye bye valves (all 16, crap).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nynyvtecjstkickdinyo
NY / NJ / CT Discussion
6
04-21-2008 05:09 PM
vaughn-gotti
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
9
08-02-2003 12:12 AM
selfproclaimedv8buff
Audi 90 / 80 / Coupe quattro / Cabriolet
22
06-27-2002 08:39 PM
Ron
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
5
02-18-2000 07:43 AM



Quick Reply: Broken timing belt doesn't always mean busted valves



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15 AM.