Audire

I need to sell one of my cars (a mechanic friend will buy one or the other), and I'm having a difficult time choosing between my '88 90 Quattro and my '90 200 Turbo (both completely stock). Whereas the manual 90 has much better handling and mileage, the automatic 200 has more power and a much nicer black leather interior. Its also a cruise ship compared to the 90. There are, of course, many other assets and detriments to both vehicles. In the collective opinion of y'all, for durability and quality, which would you hold on to?

(NOTE: to prevent bias, this question is being asked in the 90 and 200 forums) (fora?)

Marquis de Polignac

The 200 might have higher mileage but..WHO CARES?!?!?!

It is so much more luxurious than the 90s. Plus it is two years younger.

I say keep the 200, leather is fancy and aristocratic plus a lot more zippy.

I love heavy cruisers in all forms,...well except women.

lol That's my opinion