Audi A3 / S3 / RS 3 Discussion forum for the 8L and 8P Audi A3 S3 and RS3
Sponsored by: Audi Online Parts

3.2 MPG penalty?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2005, 06:13 AM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
JeffnDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.2 MPG penalty?

Any idea on how much more gasolina the 3.2 will suck? One of the main attractants of the turbo is the mpgs...
Old 10-30-2005, 06:21 AM
  #2  
New Member
 
Paris UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A friend who has one in London says it's v v thirsty
Old 10-30-2005, 06:35 AM
  #3  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
JeffnDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: A friend who has one in London says it's v v thirsty

I kinda figured, heavier, awd...the 4's mighty fine enough for me.
Old 10-30-2005, 08:20 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
cpurick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'm figuring 20mpg around town on a really good day, 26-27 hwy.

It would take some discipline to get those numbers.

VW R32 was EPA rated at 19/26.

When I had a 2.8 VR6 I was very disappointed with the mileage, but then I could never keep my foot out of that sweet, sweet pudding.

In the day of $3+ gas, the 2.0T is a godsend.
Old 10-30-2005, 01:51 PM
  #5  
New Member
 
DaveNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default That's the problem with the six...

You're pumping six cylinders whether you need 'em or not. I had the same problem with the 2.8 vs the 1.8T in my A4 -- mileage sucked. This time, even if offered when I bought my A3, I would have instantly opted for the 2.0T. Quattro is nice for the bragging rights, but I've owned many Frontrack VAGs (TT, Golf, Jetta, Beetle) and never had a traction problem, even in the snow.
Old 10-30-2005, 02:03 PM
  #6  
New Member
 
Paris UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default If I was in the US, I'd definitely go for the 3.2 but I suppose it's

all relative. I had a 3.0 A4 Cab before and before that a Golf 1.8T. The difference in MPGs was extremely noticable, especially on long drives to the Alps (7-8 hours). Now that I'm back to the 4cyl I think the mpg will improve.
Old 10-30-2005, 07:56 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
0cean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ummmm.. pudding. Im going to the kitchen
Old 11-01-2005, 05:23 PM
  #8  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
JeffnDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: That's the problem with the six...

This a3 would be my stepping stone from the M3 into Prius/Civic. I don;t know if I have it in me to cope with hybrid or even new civic (30/40epa mpg) performance. If I can coax 25+ out of the a3, I'd be golden. Sure is nice to have the engine off at red light though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gregp1962
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
3
05-21-2010 09:05 AM
velosouljah
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
25
04-01-2008 02:11 PM
Ian F
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
22
02-21-2003 03:26 PM
Jim R.
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
2
01-03-2000 05:57 AM
Herbert Siegmund
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
4
11-30-1998 04:55 PM



Quick Reply: 3.2 MPG penalty?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 AM.