UrS4boy

Thanks. Sort of what I thought. Because of the way the Canadian data is screwed up (i.e. we got two varieties of 93 UrS4 (the 92 spec ones VIN'd 93, and the 93 spec (carbon fibre ones) also VIN'd 93) yet AoA says 0 and 0. Don't think so. So I don't believe any of the numbers.

There were no 98 MY UrS6s yet they have 1? We (Canadians) think that there was only 23 (not 73) UrS6s (all sedans) delivered to Canada. But we don't know for certain.

It's a mess and always has been since that data was first published on UrS4.com

kadisandrew

I believe that you may come across that your improve and power treats the ones that could be greater in the ECU were socketed from the maker. Also, your G40 cam area indication is located in a "tuna can" company, affected off the usage cam this led to mid-Feb. 1992 when the G40 was transmitted to behind the exhaustion cam sprocket.

UrS4boy

Not sure why you effectively quoted me from Post No. 18 in this thread yet you seem to "own" this info without providing any references, either to my post or some new info.

https://www.audiworld.com/forums/sho...2814062&page=2