Discuss : GT3076R@30psi. CR Gasket. Stock engine internals. Who's done it ? Who's tried and failed ?
01-01-2008, 09:33 PM
#21
Just change the caption to "..that Dave and Nick finally agreed on something"
<center><img src="http://www.pioneertelephonecoop.com/~mchumor/religion_cartoon_7292.gif"></center><p>
01-02-2008, 01:01 AM
#23
Hmmm 600 bhp ? Stroker Engine + 1.02 A/R + 100 oct + Cheap Dyno ?
460 bhp is definitely believable. But given how tough it was to tune above 330whp on 91, and since Garrett only rates the 3071 for 500 bhp ... sounds kinda fishy.
But by all means, please post the dyno sheet, and details here - I'm sure everyone would appreciate the contribution.
But by all means, please post the dyno sheet, and details here - I'm sure everyone would appreciate the contribution.
01-02-2008, 05:00 AM
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dyno data is within the links I posted
but here's the chart (I actually had the numbers backwards, its 463 ft/lbs torque, 436hp)
<img src="http://www.theswansonfamily.us/modules/gallery2/d/55077-2/IMG_5007.JPG">
<img src="http://www.theswansonfamily.us/modules/gallery2/d/55077-2/IMG_5007.JPG">
01-02-2008, 05:02 AM
#25
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its not my car, but I bet Janis would be up for that
I agree that TDC's numbers are likely higher than tony's (all dynos read a little different, from a tuning perspective all I care about is consistency). I tried to bring my coupe down to EPL a few months back but the tranny blew up on the way, that was supposed to be my own test to compare the numbers between TDC and EPL. Anyway, I'll check with Janis and see what he wants to do.
