Brake Fluid
#2
Its a great choice, IMO
LMA, while not super high performance, absorbs water very slowly. Therefore, over time, it maintains more of its boiling point integrity and will cause les corrosion. I use it in my S6 and my C4 A6. Note, i do NOT use it in my track car, but that car's fluid is changed twice a year.
Grant
ps: man, this format stinks.
Grant
ps: man, this format stinks.
Last edited by Just Me; 03-26-2009 at 06:21 AM.
#4
AudiWorld Newcomer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: fort lauderdale
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like ATE super blue, has a higher wet boiling point than some others.
Plus its blue and you can see any leaks, and easy to flush with alternate color. castrol LMA is a good brakefluid.
IMHO, in any case, you should completly flush any brake system every few years. little messy, but cheap insurance on expensive caliper or abs sensor repairs. especially down in the humid south!
IIRC, castrol SRF is the highest dry boiling point, but its 90/qt, and it takes a few quarts to flush a system.
Plus its blue and you can see any leaks, and easy to flush with alternate color. castrol LMA is a good brakefluid.
IMHO, in any case, you should completly flush any brake system every few years. little messy, but cheap insurance on expensive caliper or abs sensor repairs. especially down in the humid south!
IIRC, castrol SRF is the highest dry boiling point, but its 90/qt, and it takes a few quarts to flush a system.
#5
AudiWorld Newcomer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: fort lauderdale
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how do I edit?
does audi have any special required brake fluids?
I use the ate... and bleed at least 2x a year.
ate:
http://www.tirerack.com/brakes/acces...tail.jsp?ID=21
SRF:
http://www.amazon.com/Brake-Fluids-C.../dp/B000JL760C
does audi have any special required brake fluids?
I use the ate... and bleed at least 2x a year.
ate:
http://www.tirerack.com/brakes/acces...tail.jsp?ID=21
SRF:
http://www.amazon.com/Brake-Fluids-C.../dp/B000JL760C
#6
I bought two liters of ATE Superblue The ATE is good if you drive your car on the street and is not just a track car. The cost is lower and the hydroscopic affinity is supposedly less than some other brands.ATE Super Blue Racing High Performance Brake Fluid is designed to excel within the extreme demands made on a race vehicle and exceeds all DOT4 standards.
#7
LMA, especially the newest LMA is excellent. Wet boiling is >> 329 degF. All DOT3 and DOT4 are chemically compatible ( its DOT4). Yes, there is higher temp fluid, but they absorb water faster, and are totally un-necessary on the street. Some people are even beginning to use LMA as poor man's track fluid (if you're not all that fast and hard on brakes.
So the short answer is, "heck yes".
G
So the short answer is, "heck yes".
G
Trending Topics
#8
Audi specs DOT4 "plus" DOT3, DOT4 and DOT4 "plus ( which is a term basically made up by Audi) are all chemically compatible and may be mixed or inter-exchanged. They differ only in boiling point.
Fluid should be flushed, not bled, every 2-3 years. This is due to the fact that brake fluid is hygroscopic and absorbs water. Water makes it boil at a lower temperature, and corrodes your brake system. In theory.
ate is good stuff. Over-kill, but good. LMA may be better since it absorbs less water.
G
Fluid should be flushed, not bled, every 2-3 years. This is due to the fact that brake fluid is hygroscopic and absorbs water. Water makes it boil at a lower temperature, and corrodes your brake system. In theory.
ate is good stuff. Over-kill, but good. LMA may be better since it absorbs less water.
G
#9
yep, each tool has its purpose. Its not "good" vs. "bad". that's why i think LMA is nto just "ok", but a great choice. Better than ate, motul, etc.
Whatever you do, no DOT5
G
Whatever you do, no DOT5
G
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
glostah
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
14
06-18-2008 03:08 AM
Niro
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
10
10-20-2004 01:51 PM
Mitaka
A8 / S8 (D2 Platform) Discussion
3
06-13-2004 11:15 PM
JWG
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
5
12-09-2002 10:52 AM