For the tri-state area peeps... Sprint vs. ATT vs. Verizon wireless, and why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2007, 10:37 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantadrive_Original's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,846
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default For the tri-state area peeps... Sprint vs. ATT vs. Verizon wireless, and why?

I have had Verizon for a while... It's been OK, with two gripes 1) The phone selection is terrible. I've had the Treo 650 for 2 years and I like it a lot, but looking ahead to my contract expiration in 2 months, the selections of Smartphones in Sprint and ATT are MUCH better.

2) The service in the greenwich, CT area for Verizon is spotty. In fact, it's spotty in a lot of areas around here. It's not terrible, and it holds a call pretty well under low signal.

That said, looking for opinions from people in the area on what they use and like. I think I'm limiting myself to those three companies, unless there's a strong fourth. I also plan to stick with a smartphone and, thus, a data plan.
Old 11-12-2007, 10:43 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
SKIroad'r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Sprint would drop calls all the damn time and ATT was even worse than Sprint

However, I've been with Verizon for the last 5 years or so, so may networks have gotten better, but I doubt it
Old 11-12-2007, 10:46 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
 
S40RCE:Smurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 12,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

T Mobile or Verizon FTW IMHO
Old 11-12-2007, 10:49 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Raistlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,133
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default I have Sprint for my personal and AT&T for my work Blackberry with voice.

I have been a Sprint PCS customer for about 10 years now and I love their service in Central and North Jersey as well as New York City (where I work). I don't think I have had a dropped call in five years.

I have had AT&T (Cingular) for a year now as my work phone and email. My good friend has Cingular (now AT&T) and his calls are ALWAYS dropping during his commute to and from the city (he lives in town next to mine). I yell at him all the time that his phone service sucks. Voice quality between ATT and Sprint is huge, Sprint blows them away.

Now mind you, AT&T has pretty good service around here, but calls do drop.
Old 11-12-2007, 11:15 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
S4Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My $.02

Been on VZW w/ a PDA phone for 3-4 years (ever since EVDO was first offered in the NYC area) in N. NJ. The $45/mo for data is hard to swallow, as is VZW's lack of support for SmartPhones beyond instructions on how to do a hard reset. That being said, I somehow doubt anyone else is much better. And yes, it takes VZW forever to get a phone out (ie - the Samsung i760 that was just released had great specs a year and a half ago when it pics/specs were first hitting the rumor mill).

AT&T has some nice offerings in Smartphones (ie, Tilt), and coverage from what I hear isn't any worse than VZW, just 'different'. Keep in mind thay have 'more bars' (as per thier advertising) because thier phones have a 5-bar scale, while VZW uses 4, so 'bars' isn't really a good comaprison. Try to find people where you spend most of your time that are ATT users to get thier personal opinion. ATT's data plans aren't cheap, but they are cheaper than VZW, and if I was to switch I could probably save ~$30/mo total over my current voice/data/txt plan for a similar allowance. Data speeds with the 3G networks are comparable to EVDO for most basic PDA functions.

Sprint has cheap voice, the cheapest data ($20 unlimited, I think, even w/ EVDO) and not a bad selection of pda phones, if you like RIM / Blackberry (though they do have the popular Touch). It seems CDMA technology (VZW/Sprint) is always behind the curve w/ new features. Sprint has a smaller network than VZW, so they roam alot on VZW's network. Depending on your plan and where you go, this may or may not be a big deal (is roaming included?), but I'm not sure how that works with data. On the other hand, I believe they were rolling out the never revisions of EVDO fairly quickly. A co-worker from Rockland County swears by them, but I always think of Sprint and TMobile last when considering alternatives to VZW.

As I've said, I've been on VZW w/ an Samsung i730 and was looking to switch. I was waiting for the Tilt on AT&T, but managed to get a free Motorola Q9m when it first came out and it's grown on me enough that I don't feel the need to shell out the money for a new pda/phone atm, though occasionally I miss the touchscreen on my i730. Other than a few dead spots where I tend to travel to in upstate NY, and an occasional data connection problem w/ the Q9m that seems to be getting better, I'll probably stick w/ VZW for the time being, unless I see a great deal on a Glofish M800 or a HTC Kaiser / Tytn II.

Oh, and if you're interested in going the Blackberry route, PM me. I have a brand new VZW 8130 that I'm not going to use.
Old 11-12-2007, 12:14 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
quattrothatcould's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I have Verizon and the Motorola Q Smartphone

Its not that much different from a Blackberry, and it works for me. I have pretty good service from North NJ all the way down to DC, so Verizon works well for me.
Old 11-12-2007, 01:52 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
daves4izzle::ASP 3-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default In South Jersey, AT&T is pretty damn good right now. I have T-Mobile and it is ok but AT&T

seems to be doing pretty well right now.

AT&T's overall coverage is very good and I don't see or hear about many dropped calls.
Old 11-12-2007, 02:25 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantadrive_Original's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,846
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default thanks for the response...

I see what you mean about Sprint, and I tend not to think of them seriously when considering phones either. In fact, I was gungho on switching to ATT for a while, and considered sprint only recently.

ATT still seems like the nicer offering then. Their phones are clearly superior (apparently the BB Curve is killer), their service sounds comparable, and the plans might even be cheaper. Sounds win-win to me!

The only thing I'm still concerned about is the potential for dropped calls. I've heard a few people around here say they get random dropped calls sometimes. Not sure if that's anything serious or not...
Old 11-12-2007, 04:54 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Judge AR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In SI-Bklyn-NJ, ATT has been great for me, Verizon's very overrated
Old 11-12-2007, 05:09 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
EastSix2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Verizon is great for most of NJ and NY when i was driving from nj to ma i had not one dropped call


Quick Reply: For the tri-state area peeps... Sprint vs. ATT vs. Verizon wireless, and why?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.