Kimchee

<b><big>Mercedes Benz ML63 AMG</big></b>
<img src="http://www.autoweek.com/images/news/101925">
<a href="http://www.autoweek.com/images/news/101925">Red X</a>

<b><big>Porsche Cayenne Turbo</big></b>
<img src="http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/03/cayenneturbo05_03.jpg">
<a href="http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/03/cayenneturbo05_03.jpg">Red X</a>

<b><big>Range Rover Sport</big></b>
<img src="http://www.automotivechronicles.com/articles/2005/mar/02/images/b33131-land-rover-range-rover-sport.jpg">
<a href="http://www.automotivechronicles.com/articles/2005/mar/02/images/b33131-land-rover-range-rover-sport.jpg">Red x</a>

<b><big>BMW X5 4.8</big></b>
<img src="http://www.modernracer.com/features/detroit2004pics/detroit2004pic25.jpg">
<a href="http://www.modernracer.com/features/detroit2004pics/detroit2004pic25.jpg">Red X</a>

NO.BRAZIL (barf)

I vote for Range Rover Sport.

ePuFFy

Cayenne Turbo's are hot too

NO.BRAZIL (barf)

Blasphemy.

Kimchee

not impressed... domestic like quality... rear seats = no room... Great looking car... interior just not up to par with the sticker.

Cayenne Turbo wins my vote hands down.

Blake@NWAutoSalon

Porsche + Turbo = Happy.

ePuFFy

and it looked like a fancy X5. Shape is pretty similar.

thecougar

So it's a different kind of "performance" but I like diesel power.

Kimchee

you said... not a purpose built "performance" suv (if that even exists). heh.

rs6shaun

I'd hit this instead. :-)
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/67630/rs6-blue.jpg">