Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

Econo-banger quicker than 3.2, 0 to 0-60mph?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2012, 10:14 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Member
Thread Starter
 
luv2sleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 509
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Econo-banger quicker than 3.2, 0 to 0-60mph?!?!

According to Edmunds.com, 2.0T is quicker than the 3.2. That can't be.... any thoughts, Bueller.... PeerBlock?

Powertrains and Performance

The 2012 Audi Q5 2.0T comes standard with all-wheel drive and a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 engine good for 211 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission is standard. EPA-estimated fuel economy is 20 mpg city/27 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined. In recent Edmunds testing, a Q5 2.0T accelerated to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds, a performance on par with the Audi's peers.

The Audi Q5 3.2 gets a 3.2-liter V6 that produces 270 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque. A six-speed automatic is standard. Surprisingly, the Q5 3.2 took just a little longer to reach 60 mph than the 2.0T, registering a 7.0-second run. Estimated fuel economy stands at 18 mpg city/23 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined, which is tops among similarly powered all-wheel-drive crossovers. Towing capacity with the 3.2 is above average, with a 4,400-pound rating when properly equipped.
Old 06-06-2012, 01:30 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
Sporta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tyneside UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Other sites rightly show that the 3.2 is 0.3 quicker to 60...cant fathom out how these vehicles sell at all when the 3.0tdi is available.
Old 06-06-2012, 02:14 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Member
 
CrustyNoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sporta
Other sites rightly show that the 3.2 is 0.3 quicker to 60...cant fathom out how these vehicles sell at all when the 3.0tdi is available.
Not available in US or Canada
Old 06-06-2012, 02:45 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
 
spijun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarajevo /BiH
Posts: 3,916
Received 358 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by luv2sleep
According to Edmunds.com, 2.0T is quicker than the 3.2. That can't be.... any thoughts, Bueller.... PeerBlock?

Powertrains and Performance

The 2012 Audi Q5 2.0T comes standard with all-wheel drive and a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 engine good for 211 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission is standard. EPA-estimated fuel economy is 20 mpg city/27 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined. In recent Edmunds testing, a Q5 2.0T accelerated to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds, a performance on par with the Audi's peers.

The Audi Q5 3.2 gets a 3.2-liter V6 that produces 270 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque. A six-speed automatic is standard. Surprisingly, the Q5 3.2 took just a little longer to reach 60 mph than the 2.0T, registering a 7.0-second run. Estimated fuel economy stands at 18 mpg city/23 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined, which is tops among similarly powered all-wheel-drive crossovers. Towing capacity with the 3.2 is above average, with a 4,400-pound rating when properly equipped.
It is not true. Here is information from the website of Audi

In Europe there is no longer the model with 3.2 engine

2.0TFSI 0-100KM/H 7,2S 3.2FSI 0-100KM/H 6,9S

Old 06-06-2012, 07:39 AM
  #5  
AudiWorld Junior Member
 
Sporta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tyneside UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrustyNoodle
Not available in US or Canada
ah rite...what is reason for that?
Old 06-06-2012, 09:22 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
ezveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sporta
ah rite...what is reason for that?
Not EPA approved.....yet. If it does come, it must be clean diesel with Adblue if V6 TDI engine is used, and the US models have different regulations from EU standards, so it will have to have slight changes to the emission systems and programming.

For me, the 2.0T with 8 speed feels bettered geared at all speeds. The 3.2 6 speed feel dogged down when accelerating at certain speeds.

Last edited by ezveedub; 06-06-2012 at 09:26 AM.
Old 06-06-2012, 10:32 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Member
 
dsackman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 3.0t (supercharge) is coming!!! Forget about the 3.2 motor.

http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publi...cle_7704.shtml

"Producing even more power is the new 3.0 TFSI – the three-liter V6 with supercharging, which replaces the 3.2-liter engine. This engine outputs 200 kW (272 hp) of power and 400 Nm (295.02 lb-ft) of torque. Key performance data: zero to 100 km/h (62.14 mph) in 5.9 seconds, top speed 234 km/h (145.40 mph), combined fuel consumption of 8.5 liters per 100 km (27.67 US mpg)."

Seems to be a slightly detuned version of the motor used in the A6 and S4/S5.

Power and good fuel consumption with the 8-speed gear box. Cannot wait...


.
Old 06-06-2012, 10:43 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
gheffty93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

According to Audi the 3.2 is quicker by about .4 of a second, but I did see at Edmunds that the 2.0T was quicker in their tests.

I I don't think the argument is whether or not the 3.2 is better than the 2.0T. Overal it is probably the better engine. The point is that it isn't better ENOUGH. The 3.0T should be better enough but the 3.2 just doesn't have a solid enough strength over the 2.0T to warrant the extra cash.
Old 06-06-2012, 12:06 PM
  #9  
Audiworld Junior Member
 
desert_q5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gheffty93
I I don't think the argument is whether or not the 3.2 is better than the 2.0T. Overal it is probably the better engine. The point is that it isn't better ENOUGH. The 3.0T should be better enough but the 3.2 just doesn't have a solid enough strength over the 2.0T to warrant the extra cash.
+1 Exactly correct. In fact I would go so far as to say that even if the 3.2 and 2.0T were the same price, I would still probably go for the 2.0T due to the better gas mileage and 8-speed trans
Old 06-06-2012, 02:05 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Member
 
c-dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 196
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by luv2sleep
According to Edmunds.com, 2.0T is quicker than the 3.2. That can't be.... any thoughts, Bueller.... PeerBlock?

Powertrains and Performance

The 2012 Audi Q5 2.0T comes standard with all-wheel drive and a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-4 engine good for 211 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission is standard. EPA-estimated fuel economy is 20 mpg city/27 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined. In recent Edmunds testing, a Q5 2.0T accelerated to 60 mph in 6.8 seconds, a performance on par with the Audi's peers.

The Audi Q5 3.2 gets a 3.2-liter V6 that produces 270 hp and 243 lb-ft of torque. A six-speed automatic is standard. Surprisingly, the Q5 3.2 took just a little longer to reach 60 mph than the 2.0T, registering a 7.0-second run. Estimated fuel economy stands at 18 mpg city/23 mpg highway and 20 mpg combined, which is tops among similarly powered all-wheel-drive crossovers. Towing capacity with the 3.2 is above average, with a 4,400-pound rating when properly equipped.
I wouldn't call 2.0T an econo banger


Quick Reply: Econo-banger quicker than 3.2, 0 to 0-60mph?!?!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 AM.