Q5/SQ5 MKI (8R) Discussion Discussion forum for the First Generation Audi Q5 SUV produced from 2008 to 2017

Need help deciding between 3.2 or 3.0T Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 06:57 AM
  #31  
AudiWorld Super User
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coolieman1220
I checked the Q today, at 70mph its at 2k rpm.

the only difference between the 335i and 335d in gearing is the final drive. I don't believe that an 8 speed has any advantage over a 6 speed in highway mileage. explain how my 335d 6 spd revs lower than any 8 speed i've seen at similar rpm.

i'm not a fan of 8 speeds, they feel like cvt transmissions.
I guess thats the advantage of the 335d's diesel engine, the extra torque can takes advantage of the low final gear ratio 2.81, cant do that with the 2.0T. The 3.0T can take some advantage with its 325 ft/lb of torque using a final gear ratio of 3.09. The 2.0T has a final gear ratio of 3.76 I beleive. Transmissions are design for either gas or diesel engines, comparing the two is like comparing apples to oranges.
Old 02-26-2012, 08:56 AM
  #32  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
tomaszp72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 815
Received 76 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

It seems like there are different versions of the 3.0T engine. The same engine but de-tuned? Not sure, you gurus probably will now

Do you know which one the Q5 will get? Q7 has this one:

HP:
280 hp @ 4920 RPM
Torque:
295 lb-ft. @ 2250 RPM

and the Q7S is rated at 333HP.
Old 02-26-2012, 11:12 AM
  #33  
AudiWorld Member
 
cprg2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The current A6 has the base 3.0T (310hp/325ft.lb) and the S4 has one with a supercharger (333hp/325ft.lb.). The Q7 can be had with either, but based on that I would guess that they could put the 3.0T that is in the A6 in the Q5 as a replacement for the 3.2 and save the supercharger for a pumped up S model...or whatever they end up calling it. Who knows, but I think that might make sense.
Old 02-26-2012, 11:20 AM
  #34  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
HotRodW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 637
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cprg2011
The current A6 has the base 3.0T (310hp/325ft.lb) and the S4 has one with a supercharger (333hp/325ft.lb.). The Q7 can be had with either, but based on that I would guess that they could put the 3.0T that is in the A6 in the Q5 as a replacement for the 3.2 and save the supercharger for a pumped up S model...or whatever they end up calling it. Who knows, but I think that might make sense.
The A6 and the S4 both have the same supercharged V6 in different states of tune. (Although performance numbers of the A6 have led to speculation that the engine's published HP is underrated.) Audi has confused the issue here by adding a "T" to a supercharged engine, when historically that would indicate a turbo. Audi defends the nomenclature by defining a supercharger as a "mechanical turbocharger."
Old 02-26-2012, 11:35 AM
  #35  
AudiWorld Member
 
cprg2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, then I'll just shut my big mouth.
The spec comparison descriptions differ on the Audi site, listing the S4 with a "mechanical charger" and the A6 without. I thought that accounted for the power difference.

I think I'd take either.
Old 02-27-2012, 08:15 AM
  #36  
AudiWorld Member
 
kip1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 3.0t is no doubt the more modern engine, 3.2 is history. Feg a5 lineup has both 3.0t and s5, so although it might be underrated, it still is no 333bhp. I myself would take the3.0 diesel w/245 bhp if it arrives there as rumors say, that engine is underrated!
Old 02-27-2012, 08:29 AM
  #37  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
JaXeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just heard from Audi Canada that the 3.0T won't be arriving until Q1 of 2013, so a 7-8month wait for me has become a 12-13 month wait... And I *will* wait.

I'd personally go for the 2.0T if I couldn't wait that long... not a fan of the 3.2.
Old 02-28-2012, 06:05 PM
  #38  
AudiWorld Newcomer
 
OnAir77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As an owner of an S4 with the 3.0t engine, and having test-driven the Q5 with the 3.2, I would overwhelmingly recommend getting the 3.0t.
I will probably get one for myself when it comes out.
.
Old 02-29-2012, 05:18 AM
  #39  
AudiWorld Super User
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I would say anybody who is on the fence right now about the 2.0T and the 3.2 should wait, if at all possible, for the 3.0T Q5 before deciding. The 3.0T is leaps and bounds better the 3.2 in terms of performance and the reliability is a bit better as well, the power band of the 3.0T is simply incredible, definitely worth the wait.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angrypengu
A8 / S8 (D5 Platform) Discussion
5
12-23-2020 07:52 PM
Anton Holmgren
Audi 100 / A6 (C4 Platform)
1
02-22-2019 06:09 AM
IknowHuhA6
A6 (C7 Platform) Discussion
19
06-07-2015 08:39 PM
thehedge
3.0TFSI Engine Discussion
0
12-06-2013 05:57 AM
MattDun
2.7T V6 Discussion
1
04-23-2010 02:09 PM



Quick Reply: Need help deciding between 3.2 or 3.0T Engine



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM.