Review of 3.2 vs. 2.0T
12-04-2010, 12:05 PM
#1
AudiWorld Newcomer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Review of 3.2 vs. 2.0T
Saw this review where they had reviewed the 3.2 and the 2.0T
http://www.nationalpost.com/Road+Tes...610/story.html
http://www.nationalpost.com/Road+Tes...610/story.html
12-04-2010, 03:05 PM
#2
AudiWorld Newcomer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-04-2010, 04:40 PM
#4
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NoVA
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drove both, and in the end landed on the 3.2. The sound and top-end pulling power with minimal sacrifice in mpg (2 mpg combined) sealed the deal. And real world mileage has been exceptional. I averaged 29mpg on a 650 mile road trip.
12-04-2010, 06:56 PM
#5
AudiWorld Senior Member
12-05-2010, 09:33 PM
#6
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow, 29 mpg is excellent from the 3.2, certainly higher than anyone else has posted. yup, i prefer the v6 sound over my 2.0T.
Trending Topics
12-06-2010, 05:45 AM
#9
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-06-2010, 07:08 AM
#10
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Really???!!! Is this per the trip computer or you calculated it based on what you actually used. My 2.0T did almost 26mpg on my first highway trip (actually used and calculated, TC said 27.2mpg). I've never heard of a 3.2 doing that well so good for you.