Your actual mileage may vary?
#3
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Love the car!! Good luck!
#5
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a 2010 Q5 3.2L with about 6,500 miles on it. 95% of my driving is in and around the city where i am averaging 18.2mpg calculated and tracked on Fuelly. Trip computer #2 is showing 17.9 mpg lifetime for the car, which is close to the real mpg i am calculating. On the few long highway trips i have taken, i have averaged right around 25mpg.
Check out Fuelly.com and search Audi Q5. There are quite a few Q5 owners posting their mileage for both 2.0T and 3.2L
Check out Fuelly.com and search Audi Q5. There are quite a few Q5 owners posting their mileage for both 2.0T and 3.2L
#7
AudiWorld Expert
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/supermod.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a 2010 Q5 3.2L with about 6,500 miles on it. 95% of my driving is in and around the city where i am averaging 18.2mpg calculated and tracked on Fuelly. Trip computer #2 is showing 17.9 mpg lifetime for the car, which is close to the real mpg i am calculating. On the few long highway trips i have taken, i have averaged right around 25mpg.
Check out Fuelly.com and search Audi Q5. There are quite a few Q5 owners posting their mileage for both 2.0T and 3.2L
Check out Fuelly.com and search Audi Q5. There are quite a few Q5 owners posting their mileage for both 2.0T and 3.2L
Trending Topics
#9
AudiWorld Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
on the 2.0. I can get 30 mpg if I keep to 55-60. On my expressway commute I can manage 31-32 when I really really baby it.
I did manage a fine 28 mpg on a 600 mile trip on interstate 44 over Christmas with 4 people and 65-69 mph.
Drive hard in the city and high teens likely but I am rarely in town.
The turbo is likely using more fuel than the 3.2 if you drive it hard. I have no data to support that other than turbos in general.
I had a 3.2 2009 model that I sold then waited a year and got a 2.0 T.
I like the 2.0 better but when passing at 60-80 mph you will miss the 3.2.
I did manage a fine 28 mpg on a 600 mile trip on interstate 44 over Christmas with 4 people and 65-69 mph.
Drive hard in the city and high teens likely but I am rarely in town.
The turbo is likely using more fuel than the 3.2 if you drive it hard. I have no data to support that other than turbos in general.
I had a 3.2 2009 model that I sold then waited a year and got a 2.0 T.
I like the 2.0 better but when passing at 60-80 mph you will miss the 3.2.
#10
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Our 2.0T gets around 19 mostly city driving.
On highway trips it gets around 27mpg loaded with 5 people. Mostly driving at 70mph or less. Which is almost identical to the EPA rating. I imagine if the roads are flat it'll pick up another MPG or so.
On highway trips it gets around 27mpg loaded with 5 people. Mostly driving at 70mph or less. Which is almost identical to the EPA rating. I imagine if the roads are flat it'll pick up another MPG or so.