STRONGLY Considering Q7 Lease, but I have 4 kids all in car seats... HELP!
10-18-2011, 11:01 AM
#21
Audiworld Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Couldn't agree more.
Minivans used to repulse me too...until I stopped listening to other "non owners" and bought a top end one and lived with it. Having said that, if you are really set on putting 4 kids (especially still in car seats) in something other than a minivan I would pick something other than the Q7. Go for an Escalade or a Suburban or an Infiniti QX or some other monster SUV or I suggest you will replace repulsion with frustration.
Minivans used to repulse me too...until I stopped listening to other "non owners" and bought a top end one and lived with it. Having said that, if you are really set on putting 4 kids (especially still in car seats) in something other than a minivan I would pick something other than the Q7. Go for an Escalade or a Suburban or an Infiniti QX or some other monster SUV or I suggest you will replace repulsion with frustration.
The Infinity QX has the same problem as my Armada LE (which is the QX with Nissan emblems)...
1 tether strap in 3rd row and no way to get to third row except for from tailgate.
Escalades and Suburbans will cost me much more than the Q7 because they're residual value is garbage and will cost me much more in gas since I'll be lucky to get 15 MPG.
Expedition is same deal as far as lease price and MPG.
Wanted an Expedition Limited which had a sticker of $41K and salesman told me I can lease it for $900 a month with $4K down. What a joke!
Thanks,
Jay D
10-28-2011, 06:46 AM
#22
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
only way around it is if you get the captain's chairs... this way you can just walk through the center like a minivan but still retain the suv styling/handling.
the other option is a mb r-class... sure it is a refined "town and country" but it is a nice minivan and most likely the only one i would ever own.
the other option is a mb r-class... sure it is a refined "town and country" but it is a nice minivan and most likely the only one i would ever own.
See my comment below on the R-class.
10-28-2011, 06:58 AM
#23
AudiWorld Expert
suv handles better than minivan and q7 w/ adaptive suspension and 21" wheels handles very well, add cayenne rear sway bar and it handles extremely well...
i drove a 3.6 with the stock spring suspension and it was awful. underpowered, floaty, and a lot of body roll.
i drove a 3.6 with the stock spring suspension and it was awful. underpowered, floaty, and a lot of body roll.
10-28-2011, 07:17 AM
#24
AudiWorld Senior Member
I would get a escalade the long version. I had a 2008 escalade and it was a great truck. No problems what so ever and the fit and finish was awesome. Never no rattles. I have a 2010 s5 now and it rattles. With that many car seats I would go with the long one. Maybe a gmc Yukon Denali xl. Same thing just 10 grand cheaper. I love gm products I have a 2010 gmc Sierra now also.
10-28-2011, 07:38 AM
#25
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the R-class suggestions...
In 2007, we looked at both the Q7 and R-class when we upsized the family from 2 children to 3. We were moving from an allroad family car. We found that the R-class had a much better and more practical layout for accessing the children and loading stuff; the interior was just better designed for maximizing space and functionality. The R-class had much better handling and ride characteristics as well. Topping all that off, Mercedes also offered a diesel, which Audi was not yet offering. We opted for the MB, and being long time MB people (except 2 Audis & a Porsche) we bought it remembering the build quality and reliability of our old MB diesels.
HUGE MISTAKE.
While we still appreciate the layout and now realize that the Q7 (and similar SUV 7 passenger layouts) are ridiculously unworkable for those with more than 2 car-seats, we cannot in good conscience suggest that anyone ever even consider the R-class. Build quality and reliability have been worse than we could have imagined possible. The list of problems and poor MBNA responses has been too long for me to get into here without throwing my laptop across the room; suffice it to say that we are getting rid of this car, possibly for a Q7 (now that 2 of our 4 can go without child seats), AND WE WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MB AGAIN.
...and we definitely should have bought the allroad off lease. That was a great car, 3 years and never a single problem/issue.
In 2007, we looked at both the Q7 and R-class when we upsized the family from 2 children to 3. We were moving from an allroad family car. We found that the R-class had a much better and more practical layout for accessing the children and loading stuff; the interior was just better designed for maximizing space and functionality. The R-class had much better handling and ride characteristics as well. Topping all that off, Mercedes also offered a diesel, which Audi was not yet offering. We opted for the MB, and being long time MB people (except 2 Audis & a Porsche) we bought it remembering the build quality and reliability of our old MB diesels.
HUGE MISTAKE.
While we still appreciate the layout and now realize that the Q7 (and similar SUV 7 passenger layouts) are ridiculously unworkable for those with more than 2 car-seats, we cannot in good conscience suggest that anyone ever even consider the R-class. Build quality and reliability have been worse than we could have imagined possible. The list of problems and poor MBNA responses has been too long for me to get into here without throwing my laptop across the room; suffice it to say that we are getting rid of this car, possibly for a Q7 (now that 2 of our 4 can go without child seats), AND WE WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MB AGAIN.
...and we definitely should have bought the allroad off lease. That was a great car, 3 years and never a single problem/issue.
10-28-2011, 07:58 AM
#26
AudiWorld Member
As for the R-class suggestions...
In 2007, we looked at both the Q7 and R-class when we upsized the family from 2 children to 3. We were moving from an allroad family car. We found that the R-class had a much better and more practical layout for accessing the children and loading stuff; the interior was just better designed for maximizing space and functionality. The R-class had much better handling and ride characteristics as well. Topping all that off, Mercedes also offered a diesel, which Audi was not yet offering. We opted for the MB, and being long time MB people (except 2 Audis & a Porsche) we bought it remembering the build quality and reliability of our old MB diesels.
HUGE MISTAKE.
While we still appreciate the layout and now realize that the Q7 (and similar SUV 7 passenger layouts) are ridiculously unworkable for those with more than 2 car-seats, we cannot in good conscience suggest that anyone ever even consider the R-class. Build quality and reliability have been worse than we could have imagined possible. The list of problems and poor MBNA responses has been too long for me to get into here without throwing my laptop across the room; suffice it to say that we are getting rid of this car, possibly for a Q7 (now that 2 of our 4 can go without child seats), AND WE WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MB AGAIN.
...and we definitely should have bought the allroad off lease. That was a great car, 3 years and never a single problem/issue.
In 2007, we looked at both the Q7 and R-class when we upsized the family from 2 children to 3. We were moving from an allroad family car. We found that the R-class had a much better and more practical layout for accessing the children and loading stuff; the interior was just better designed for maximizing space and functionality. The R-class had much better handling and ride characteristics as well. Topping all that off, Mercedes also offered a diesel, which Audi was not yet offering. We opted for the MB, and being long time MB people (except 2 Audis & a Porsche) we bought it remembering the build quality and reliability of our old MB diesels.
HUGE MISTAKE.
While we still appreciate the layout and now realize that the Q7 (and similar SUV 7 passenger layouts) are ridiculously unworkable for those with more than 2 car-seats, we cannot in good conscience suggest that anyone ever even consider the R-class. Build quality and reliability have been worse than we could have imagined possible. The list of problems and poor MBNA responses has been too long for me to get into here without throwing my laptop across the room; suffice it to say that we are getting rid of this car, possibly for a Q7 (now that 2 of our 4 can go without child seats), AND WE WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER MB AGAIN.
...and we definitely should have bought the allroad off lease. That was a great car, 3 years and never a single problem/issue.
10-31-2011, 10:34 AM
#27
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-31-2011, 05:30 PM
#28
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am so glad to hear this. We cross-shopped the R-Class (and GL Class) prior to settling on the 2012 Q7. I never warmed up to the R-Class but my wife put huge pressure on me to consider it because of many of the reasons you stated. In the end a test drive in the Q7 Sport (S-line) convinced us both to grab one. We couldn't be happier...really a great vehicle. Sounds like we dodged a bullet!
11-01-2011, 06:31 AM
#29
Will a hull size Infiniti QX56 with captains chairs in the middle room work?
Not as big (close, lol) as a full blown Escalade or Burb and not a mini van.
Geez, just typing mini van gives me the pee pee shivers...
Not as big (close, lol) as a full blown Escalade or Burb and not a mini van.
Geez, just typing mini van gives me the pee pee shivers...
12-04-2011, 07:27 AM
#30
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the end we bought a Volvo XC-90 over the Q7, this time.
What ultimately made the difference:
1. Volvo integrated booster meant that we can lose one booster seat, freeing up space and giving more seating flexibility.
2. The XC-90 2nd row is 40/20/40 and each seat slides and folds independently, offering much greater seating/cargo flexibility and better leg space options for the 2nd and 3rd row occupants.
3. The XC-90 has more cargo space behind the 3rd row.
4. We could get a CPO 2008 XC-90 with tons of warranty for the same price as an 2007 3.0 w/ more miles and no warranty.
All this being said we'll be needing to buy a 2nd car that can seat the whole family in a pinch soon and are more likely to opt for the Q7 then, as the above factors won't be as important since it will be a secondary family-hauler (and my main commuter). And Audi's got the diesel!
What ultimately made the difference:
1. Volvo integrated booster meant that we can lose one booster seat, freeing up space and giving more seating flexibility.
2. The XC-90 2nd row is 40/20/40 and each seat slides and folds independently, offering much greater seating/cargo flexibility and better leg space options for the 2nd and 3rd row occupants.
3. The XC-90 has more cargo space behind the 3rd row.
4. We could get a CPO 2008 XC-90 with tons of warranty for the same price as an 2007 3.0 w/ more miles and no warranty.
All this being said we'll be needing to buy a 2nd car that can seat the whole family in a pinch soon and are more likely to opt for the Q7 then, as the above factors won't be as important since it will be a secondary family-hauler (and my main commuter). And Audi's got the diesel!