first two b7rs4 FATS logs (courtesy RI RS4)
01-09-2007, 04:49 PM
#12
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doing the math, it's faster than a regular stage 2/2+ B5 S4 on 93 octane...
in that MPH range by 2-4/10ths.
As for a Stage 3 B5 S4 if you're wondering... mine was 3.21 on 93 octane... (from a typical 3.50 B5 S4 FATS log).
As for a Stage 3 B5 S4 if you're wondering... mine was 3.21 on 93 octane... (from a typical 3.50 B5 S4 FATS log).
01-09-2007, 07:18 PM
#18
AudiWorld Expert
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 33,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5500 because its peak torque, 7800 for two reasons
1) it gives *almost* comparable fats times for 3rd to a b5s4
2) im kinda scared to ask b7rs4 owners to always run it out to redline for logging. I dont want any blown 4.2s on my conscience.
2) im kinda scared to ask b7rs4 owners to always run it out to redline for logging. I dont want any blown 4.2s on my conscience.
01-10-2007, 06:07 AM
#20
This was actually on 93 octane V-power
But it doesnt' make a difference, since the timing maps were done for 91 octane. We need to wait for a chip that's adjusted for 93 octane, or at least until I get to a tuner who knows what he's doing, and a dyno.