500+ hp audi s4
07-23-2012, 08:59 PM
#11
The panamera turbo is brutally fast. Well over 500lb ft of torque. There are several published 0-60 in the 3.5 - 3.7 range.
I have quite a bit of seat time in the turbo, and while I'm not claiming my little old revo tune is as fast as primetme or imola, the turbo is on another planet.
I have quite a bit of seat time in the turbo, and while I'm not claiming my little old revo tune is as fast as primetme or imola, the turbo is on another planet.
07-24-2012, 05:26 AM
#12
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for the record guys, anyone who measures performance with 0-60 times is a magazine racer, thus I can GUARANTEE the OP is speaking about crank horsepower, not wheel horsepower. So he wants to make around 425 whp with his car. That will probably be possible if you push the TVS1320 with race gas and a catless exhaust that is not restrictive. The RS4 with the APR TVS1320 kit on it made around that with pretty much no other mods. The blower, when maxed out, should be good for around 500-525 crank hp when flowing to its max. Of course the efficiency range you'll be in at that point isn't awesome. that's why lots of guys are hoping for a TVS1900 kit.
hp does not equate to a particular 0-60 time.
The TTRS making around 375 hp has been clocked at around 3.7-3.9 a few times. So was the 525hp R8 5.2.
p.s. how did you measure your car at 3.9 seconds to 60 mph? Based on your quarter mile time, that's not far fetched...just wondering what device you used to test it. I have used GTECH PRO RR and PBOX on my cars in the past for fun testing. Pretty accurate.
p.s.s. quit ripping parts out of your car to be fast please. It is an Audi.
The TTRS making around 375 hp has been clocked at around 3.7-3.9 a few times. So was the 525hp R8 5.2.
p.s. how did you measure your car at 3.9 seconds to 60 mph? Based on your quarter mile time, that's not far fetched...just wondering what device you used to test it. I have used GTECH PRO RR and PBOX on my cars in the past for fun testing. Pretty accurate.
p.s.s. quit ripping parts out of your car to be fast please. It is an Audi.
Last edited by sakimano; 07-24-2012 at 05:31 AM.
07-24-2012, 01:13 PM
#14
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Alexandria VA/Cleveland OH
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
p.s.s. quit ripping parts out of your car to be fast please. It is an Audi.[/QUOTE]
no worries there either. i am keeping my car as stock looking on the outside as possible. i like the factory look to it!
i am not changing anything that cannot be reversed! i would never make a change that would be permanent by ruining a part of the car.
no worries there either. i am keeping my car as stock looking on the outside as possible. i like the factory look to it!
i am not changing anything that cannot be reversed! i would never make a change that would be permanent by ruining a part of the car.
07-24-2012, 03:50 PM
#16
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Alexandria VA/Cleveland OH
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-24-2012, 04:08 PM
#18
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Alexandria VA/Cleveland OH
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-27-2012, 04:32 PM
#20
exactly. Plus, if you ar ereally after true seat-of-the-pants HP, its either more ci or more fi. Those are the real McCoys. The "chip" stuff is a joke compared to the other 2. Just remember though, more HP is a blast but "You Play, you Pay." Be ready for it.