clochner

Just read Audiworld's write-up on the new RS5, and I still think it looks like an amazing car. So much so that I may just be tempted when it comes stateside.

I know a lot of folks here have been down on the RS5 (NA engine, lack of significant power gains over the S4, etc.). But I'm a sucker for V8s, what can I say?

NWS4Guy

Lose the tunability of a FI engine, lose 2 doors, get a less fuel efficient, heavier engine, and slower overall vehicle for a substantially increased price.


So tempted...

Excelsior7

I'm not, simply because a traditional stick is still a requirement for me.

Mick4

At that price point, I would personally gratify my irrational need for a CPO'd C4S...which I may do anyway. But I can't justify the sacrifices mentioned previously for the RS5.

no cell

...........and lose the CHOICE of having a 3rd pedal. No thanks.

Zed 2.0

Not in the least. The 4.2 is on its way out, and the 3.0 can be made just as powerful with ease. Audi also went a bit too "look at me" on some of the styling cues. Not to mention it pretty consistently places dead last when compared to similar cars from other companies.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...udi_rs5_page_2

clochner

Really?? I was unaware that S-Tronic is the only trans option for the RS5. That's surprising.

rktskicar

Yes. Serious drawback for me.

Bruce

JMSIV

I have to have 4-doors, at least for the car the RS5 would be (daily driver).

I'd buy a used RS4 before I'd get an RS5. It is a goooood looking car though, no doubt about that.

clochner

It is a FANTASTIC looking car. I'd also opt for an RS4 first, but it could be several years before we see the new model.