New dyno #'s...
#11
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sak: I don't mind the discussion @ all - always better to have more info out there than not. I didn't realize that CircuitTested was just a one-man operation. His posts always refer to "we" and "our," so that's how I made my assumption.
At the end of the day, though, I'm still glad I went w/ the Milltek - love the way my car sounds. Good thing I got in on it before the price increase - think it's like $2700 now!
Def agree on the pulley testing - APR should have tested the pulley on DSGs before releasing it. They are a great company, but that's kind of a big slip-up, IMO.
At the end of the day, though, I'm still glad I went w/ the Milltek - love the way my car sounds. Good thing I got in on it before the price increase - think it's like $2700 now!
Def agree on the pulley testing - APR should have tested the pulley on DSGs before releasing it. They are a great company, but that's kind of a big slip-up, IMO.
#12
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sak: I don't mind the discussion @ all - always better to have more info out there than not. I didn't realize that CircuitTested was just a one-man operation. His posts always refer to "we" and "our," so that's how I made my assumption.
At the end of the day, though, I'm still glad I went w/ the Milltek - love the way my car sounds. Good thing I got in on it before the price increase - think it's like $2700 now!
Def agree on the pulley testing - APR should have tested the pulley on DSGs before releasing it. They are a great company, but that's kind of a big slip-up, IMO.
At the end of the day, though, I'm still glad I went w/ the Milltek - love the way my car sounds. Good thing I got in on it before the price increase - think it's like $2700 now!
Def agree on the pulley testing - APR should have tested the pulley on DSGs before releasing it. They are a great company, but that's kind of a big slip-up, IMO.
Had to be 2010, and had to be DSG. Scott had his done the same time I did and has not had any issues with his 2011, nor any other 2011's.
#14
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed. And kudos to them for swiftly solving the problem. I just think they should have tested a DSG car before releasing it.
#15
#16
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
AudiWorld Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You should do a bit more research before speaking next time. Plenty of timeslips and video from Ron to prove your assumption incorrect.
#20
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I love that it is possible to get these numbers out of the car but it is not physically possible to run a 12 second quarter mile with 360 hp and a 4000lb + car, Either the quarter mile reading is wrong or the dyno is wrong.