Only 400 miles on odo...ECU tune ok?
#11
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
At least two the B8 S4 3.0T engines self destructed (without an ECU tune) at less than 1k miles. The warranty discussion with the Dealer and Audi might have been a little more testy in those cases, if the ECU tune was present,at the the time. If Audi wants to know bad enough, they can figure out if the ECU was tuned.
Some people are risk takers some are not. That is for you to decide. Most likely you could get a tune right now and never have a problem, or you could be the one in 100,000 people, that has an issue (not even related to the ECU tune).
https://www.audiworld.com/forums/sho...2787539&page=2
It is really just a personal decision, to tune the ECU, with only 1k miles on the engine.
Some people are risk takers some are not. That is for you to decide. Most likely you could get a tune right now and never have a problem, or you could be the one in 100,000 people, that has an issue (not even related to the ECU tune).
https://www.audiworld.com/forums/sho...2787539&page=2
It is really just a personal decision, to tune the ECU, with only 1k miles on the engine.
#12
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
One failed engine had a fractured connecting rod, probably a manufacturing defect, but a dealer could blame an ECU tune.
One is never 100% safe, infant mortality can happen on new engines.
#13
#14
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is not the point. Audi could makes the fix a lot more difficult, if the ECU tune was in place.
One failed engine had a fractured connecting rod, probably a manufacturing defect, but a dealer could blame an ECU tune.
One is never 100% safe, infant mortality can happen on new engines.
One failed engine had a fractured connecting rod, probably a manufacturing defect, but a dealer could blame an ECU tune.
One is never 100% safe, infant mortality can happen on new engines.
#15
AudiWorld Super User
![](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/ranks/supermod.jpg)
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Any concerns about the chip-tuning being over-written at a future service? Audi seems to release quite a few updates, some that will reset the ECU. Find out about the company's policy for restoring your tune should it become an issue in the future.
#16
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It happens, though very very infrequently. When it does, APR (for example) already has been aware in the past and has the reflash ready that incorporates the changes Audi made, which are likely for reliability, bug fixes, etc, on top of the original tune, and they always reflash for free. The trick is that right now that means shipping the ECU back and being with no car again for a few days.
#17
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In any case I do think the APR tune is safe, and I doubt there would be any sort of problem, but taking it past 1000 mi first isn't a bad idea at all if for nothing else than peace of mind.
#18
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Putting on 1,000 miles first, before ECU tune, would be prudent, to make sure you received a quality engine. One should not treat the unlikely as impossible (the black swan mistake of the financial sector collapse recently).
#19
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IIRC, they hooked one of them up to some sort of special machine that verified that there was no tune on the ECU. Whether this supplies the encryption key and does an actual ECU checksum verification or just checks the flash counter bit that APR resets to zero, I have no idea. I suspect that in the case of catastrophic engine failure they may indeed look in that direction as it's a fairly costly repair, whether they suspect it or not, and the burden would then be on the owner to fight off in court.
In any case I do think the APR tune is safe, and I doubt there would be any sort of problem, but taking it past 1000 mi first isn't a bad idea at all if for nothing else than peace of mind.
In any case I do think the APR tune is safe, and I doubt there would be any sort of problem, but taking it past 1000 mi first isn't a bad idea at all if for nothing else than peace of mind.
APR (I can't speak for the others) always records whatever number is present before the flash it, and replace that same value there during the flash, so there is no incremental change in this number for them to note.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AutoUnionQ7
Q7 MK 1 Discussion
40
11-22-2007 04:05 PM
4.2MingBlue
A6 / S6 (C5 Platform) Discussion
1
09-03-2001 07:34 AM