What conclusions would you draw...
05-24-2010, 08:44 AM
#11
AudiWorld Super User
Funny you say that DrGP...my choices were either a 5.0 Mustang or the S4. I ultimately went with the S4 because the deal I'm getting simply cannot be beat. My decision was made from a finances point of view, not a vehicle point of view. I would have ultimately been VERY happy with either.
05-24-2010, 10:30 AM
#12
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Zerin...
What deal on as S4 was good enough to beat Ford pricing?
Re the original post... The reason the Audi is so close is probably mostly due to traction. American muscle cars have virtually none. If you ran the three cars to 150, the Audi would be WAY behind.
Re the original post... The reason the Audi is so close is probably mostly due to traction. American muscle cars have virtually none. If you ran the three cars to 150, the Audi would be WAY behind.
05-24-2010, 11:43 AM
#13
AudiWorld Super User
Even a run to 0-100mph, the S4 is behind. The Mustang and Camaro are limited by traction off the line (on street tires).
"0-100
S4:12.0
SS:10.5
GT: 11.0"
"0-100
S4:12.0
SS:10.5
GT: 11.0"
05-24-2010, 05:32 PM
#18
AudiWorld Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is some more data from Car & Driver reviews;
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...c32_amg_page_4
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests
Weight:
2010 S4: 4000#
2004 S4: 3864#
2003 C32: 3651#
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...c32_amg_page_4
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mparison_tests
Weight:
2010 S4: 4000#
2004 S4: 3864#
2003 C32: 3651#
Is this right??? The B8 is heavier than my B6?
