Is 469WHP possible on stock internals?
#22
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
in that its not gonna read like a mustang/large roller dynojet let alone a dynapack, dyno dynamics or maha in that order.... his car has similar code to Diego and Nye, moss loaded it and tested the car iirc.
#24
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What is the point of that? I know its hard to compare numbers across dynos, but that is just flat out wrong.
-Dave Pramanik
-Dave Pramanik
#27
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
First off the AF ratios are waaaaay off. That is far to lean.
Second why does the torque curve bounce around so much. This is going to be throttle cut, boost spikes or detonation. All of which need to be addressed.
Otherwise the HP curve looks good. It should be a blast to drive and safe once those issues are sorted.
As far as HP is concerned we all understand the differences between dynos. Use the dyno as tool to evaluate progress and correct problems and don't get lost on the numbers.
FWIW the SAE correction factor of 1.23 seems incorrect. If you take out the correction factor the real WHP is 375.
Second why does the torque curve bounce around so much. This is going to be throttle cut, boost spikes or detonation. All of which need to be addressed.
Otherwise the HP curve looks good. It should be a blast to drive and safe once those issues are sorted.
As far as HP is concerned we all understand the differences between dynos. Use the dyno as tool to evaluate progress and correct problems and don't get lost on the numbers.
FWIW the SAE correction factor of 1.23 seems incorrect. If you take out the correction factor the real WHP is 375.