S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

been playing around with the car, adding timing. Whats a safe level for correction factor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2006, 09:46 PM
  #21  
AudiWorld Super User
 
B5QShip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mike2kS4 has talked about exactly what JD is describing. Whether Mike is right or not, I dunno
Old 09-02-2006, 09:47 PM
  #22  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Nigel (no more S4)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2nd on this, teach me too please.
Old 09-02-2006, 09:52 PM
  #23  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Seems to be where the car is fastest...at least for me.

Above that and timing gets choppier while perfmance doesn't increase much if any.

Below that and overall timing drops in some spots, performance goes down a bit.

Obviously, I'm generalizing. Some of my fastest runs have been mid to high single digits CFs, but lately they have been in high single digits to low double digits.
Old 09-02-2006, 10:03 PM
  #24  
Member
 
Ochlockonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Knock sensor control limit is 12 degrees-Bentley. Oviously software can raise that limit.
Old 09-02-2006, 10:04 PM
  #25  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Nigel (no more S4)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

right, but that still doesn't tell me where you saw 16
Old 09-02-2006, 10:09 PM
  #26  
Member
 
Ochlockonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

EcuX, where else?
Old 09-02-2006, 10:13 PM
  #27  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hmm, would like to see a stock ECU'd car advance timing to point of pegging CFs. *edit*

I've never heard that it was software dependent...thought 15 was for everything. Wee, good information came out of this.

*edit*

The more I think about it, the more I think maybe bentley is just wrong. Why would all the major tuners (except MTM, lol) choose 15 as new CF # and how would they have control to change that but not other things? Sure seems fishy to me.
Old 09-02-2006, 10:31 PM
  #28  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Farb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I think that if we are in the mood for more we can try cranking up the mbc even more and see if we

get some more juice out of it.
Old 09-02-2006, 10:33 PM
  #29  
Member
 
PSmalls::AnalRetentiveNumbNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What were the peak MAF readings? Injector on time/duty cycle? Graphs...
Old 09-02-2006, 10:36 PM
  #30  
AudiWorld Super User
 
B5QShip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

peak MAF was 270-275 or so. No logs of inj duty cycle yet


Quick Reply: been playing around with the car, adding timing. Whats a safe level for correction factor?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 AM.