S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

Cost aside, what are the pros and cons of a K03/K04 vs. a K03/16 vs. a tribrid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2005, 05:06 AM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantgarde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cost aside, what are the pros and cons of a K03/K04 vs. a K03/16 vs. a tribrid?

Why would you go with one vs. the other. Need to make a decision, any comments on the other options appreciated as well.

Tim
Old 04-26-2005, 05:16 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
StreetCrawler(Cole)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Just researched this and here is what I came up with...

I just did a bunch of research on this and here were the main points I could see.

K03/K04...performs a bit better than stock, does not fall totally on its face at high RPM like a K03

K03/K16...100rpm or so more lag than stock...bit better flow than K03/k04 especially in the top end.

K04/K16v2(tribrid)...Spools more like a true K04. (more lag 500rpm-ish) and from what I understand could flow "almost" as well as a straigh K04.

Seems like the further you go up the list the more "potential" you have latter on for other mods.

FWIW I found some K04s and ended up buying those instead.
Old 04-26-2005, 05:54 AM
  #3  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantgarde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Here is my real question - the lag in my mind is inconsequential, so why would anyone not

go full tribrid?
Old 04-26-2005, 06:40 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantgarde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default When you say better matched>

do you mean a more efficeient / reliable turbo?

I am sold on Jacob's work, however, a part of me thinks the less changes the less chance for future issues (which leads me away from the tribrid).

The other part of me thinks that the tribrid is the best option because, as you say, it may be "better matched"?
Old 04-26-2005, 07:02 AM
  #5  
Rest In Peace
 
O.W. Kenobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 19,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Unproven technology at this point? With non-hybrid K04s, reliability usually isn't a concern.

Who knows how the hybrids and tribrids will hold up over time.
Old 04-26-2005, 07:21 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantgarde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Agreed. But I am looking at hybrid vs. hybrid vs. "tribrid".

Any opinions on that?
Old 04-26-2005, 07:26 AM
  #7  
Rest In Peace
 
O.W. Kenobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 19,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

None whatsoever. I don't know much about hybrid or tribrid turbos.
Old 04-26-2005, 07:29 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Dr. Jekyll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Here is an interesting recent discussion

obviously just people voicing their opinions, but a good discussion none the less...<ul><li><a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/1976573.phtml">https://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/1976573.phtml</a></li></ul>
Old 04-26-2005, 07:50 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
Avantgarde's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks - I missed that.
Old 04-26-2005, 08:08 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Imolavirus@BuehnEngineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default K03/16 aren't going to have a lag increase over the K03/K04, it's only the clipping that's going

to incrase the lag ~100rpm or so


Quick Reply: Cost aside, what are the pros and cons of a K03/K04 vs. a K03/16 vs. a tribrid?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 AM.