got an opportunity to run a C32 AMG 2nite......................
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Black C32 AMG with Chip, Pulley, Exhaust, and K&N Filters. Very nice car! We did 2 highway roll-ons (from 55 to about 110-120ish). I would pull immediately on 3rd honk, and would pull steadily till we lifted. Prob about 6 cars or so, give or take on each run. We got off the exit and got onto this long open stretch where there are no cars. We did a 15 mph roll-on to 100. I don't know how many cars it was...but Stage 3 S4 pulled pretty hard. Buslengths? or so. I was on 97-98 Octane, which gave me the advantage. I had never ran a C32 or C55 AMG before, so it was good to see the comparos. I have video...but need to get it from the passenger that was riding in my car. All in all, a fun night!! =)
#2
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ne on the race program? so many people have told me that the race program is just sick but i can't imagine it being as huge a jump from running 100 octane on the 91 file. *shrug*
i remember when i ran straight 100 octane on my ams stage 2 chip and wasn't really impressed. if anything, the drivability was much better... but power wise, it wasn't that crazy... maybe i i was expecting too much.
hopefully this isn't the case with the race program?
i remember when i ran straight 100 octane on my ams stage 2 chip and wasn't really impressed. if anything, the drivability was much better... but power wise, it wasn't that crazy... maybe i i was expecting too much.
hopefully this isn't the case with the race program?
#4
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
im not sure how much faster XR on 100 compared to X is, but i'd say XR with racegas is .5-.6 seconds faster in FATs than with Pump 91 file on Racegas, it is about .3 Faster, so there is prob a difference. I'm not sure how much though. How's you car running? U have the 5 program'?
#5
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
car is running okay. i want to get the race program but was curious if paying the extra 600 for the race program is really worth it...
btw...
"XR with racegas is .5-.6 seconds faster in FATs than with Pump 91 file on Racegas, it is about .3 Faster"
i'm confused... so xr is .5-.6 seconds faster than 91 file on race grace? what's the .3 referring to?
btw...
"XR with racegas is .5-.6 seconds faster in FATs than with Pump 91 file on Racegas, it is about .3 Faster"
i'm confused... so xr is .5-.6 seconds faster than 91 file on race grace? what's the .3 referring to?
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i know i didnt. you can get one more additional file flashed in addition to your stock stage 3 pump file.
#9
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
will go up to about 103 to 104.
So XR will run more strongly with 100 octane than the X. (explanation from one of the GIAC guys at the AWE booth at Waterfest 2005).
So XR will run more strongly with 100 octane than the X. (explanation from one of the GIAC guys at the AWE booth at Waterfest 2005).