Has anyone done any testing between AWE, Ebay, ASP intercoolers??
05-19-2007, 06:32 AM
#42
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I'm assuming it's more of a gradual process..
I don't believe it "hit's a wall", for the reasons you've mentioned. Yea, the AWE data does make that seem questionable, I'd love to take some readings on them to better determine what's going on.
05-19-2007, 06:46 AM
#44
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool, that'd be great Dave.
We could definitely use some direct data on this that may help explain some observations.
This discussion can resume with some real data on the table.
This discussion can resume with some real data on the table.
05-19-2007, 07:51 AM
#46
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 9,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I reeeaaaly wish AWE would have shown the data above 6300 RPMs on theirs vs the RS4s....
may paint an entirely different picture re the two. Everyone cares about flow/losses up top right?
05-19-2007, 08:02 AM
#47
Elder Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I told you that car runs MBC in place of N75, would that explain it for you?
Mike2ks4 claimed midget's car tapered a lot more at high boost than another MBC only car with AWE SMICs and that was his reason for concluding that RS4 SMICs had a pressure loss problem. However, it looks as though he's wrong.
05-19-2007, 08:20 AM
#49
New Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rs4`s are tube/fin design and awe is bar/plate so isnt bar/plate better?learning so plz be nice...
also doesnt bar/plate work better at higher boost levels.im not talking about cheap ebay cores but i thought awe had good cores,spearco maybe?
