Hmmm.. Something to ponder.
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So the AutoSpeed car did 490whp right? And a stock car on the same dyno does 213whp right?
So when you compare that dyno to our super happy pink little pony dynojet@Harmann my car did 467whp on race gas and a stock s4 does 197whp on pump.
<img src="http://www.torque-factory.com/plots/brian.JPG">
And my car with the exact same setup did 427whp on GIACs Mustang..... seems as though neither of the SoCal dynos are the little pink pony calibrated dynos. Has there been any logs posted from the gt25 car yet? No offense to AutoSpeed, Mark, or the owner of the car but I'm a little skeptical of the dyno numbers at this point.
<img src="http://www.elswhere.net/molas.jpg">
and for reference my car did 416whp on pump on the same dynojet@Harmann
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/71856/run_01.jpg">
Just for comparo here is the AutoSpeed plots
<img src="http://www.autospeedperformance.com/images/dyno.jpg">
<img src="http://autospeedperformance.com/images/dynocomparo.jpg">
So when you compare that dyno to our super happy pink little pony dynojet@Harmann my car did 467whp on race gas and a stock s4 does 197whp on pump.
<img src="http://www.torque-factory.com/plots/brian.JPG">
And my car with the exact same setup did 427whp on GIACs Mustang..... seems as though neither of the SoCal dynos are the little pink pony calibrated dynos. Has there been any logs posted from the gt25 car yet? No offense to AutoSpeed, Mark, or the owner of the car but I'm a little skeptical of the dyno numbers at this point.
<img src="http://www.elswhere.net/molas.jpg">
and for reference my car did 416whp on pump on the same dynojet@Harmann
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/71856/run_01.jpg">
Just for comparo here is the AutoSpeed plots
<img src="http://www.autospeedperformance.com/images/dyno.jpg">
<img src="http://autospeedperformance.com/images/dynocomparo.jpg">
#4
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the opposite problem of dynoing on the "death dyno" on which an AWE stg3 can barely make 300hp.
The GT kit is so detuned that peak HP really doesn't matter - it'll run whatever boost the stock engine can handle. What does matter is that it spools well.
The GT kit is so detuned that peak HP really doesn't matter - it'll run whatever boost the stock engine can handle. What does matter is that it spools well.
#5
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What makes you think the car is so detuned? The car obviously makes big power and probably is faster on pump gas then a K04 car on race gas. Just was comparing somethings and thought I would share. I know Diego and I caught a bunch of **** from everyone when we posted those dynos, that the dyno read SUPER high. And I agree it does but not quite as high as it appears that Mustang reads.
#6
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You can question dyno charts all you want...but I'll be DAMNED if you simply call it a pink little pony </end sarcasm>
Good point, I'll be interested in what comes of this thread
Good point, I'll be interested in what comes of this thread
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Trending Topics
#9
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
there is a stock car's run for comparison on both dynos so you can adjust, no?