MBC in parallel with TCD gives you total control over boost does it not??
09-27-2006, 01:48 PM
#3
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No. Assuming 1bar TCD and K03 X chip, requested boost will go below "actual" boost in upper RPMs...
N75 then would theoretically taper boost more than MBC only.
I used to run MBC in parallel, switched to MBC only later and can't say for certain that boost tapered changed much. With that said, I'm very happy with MBC only drivability so I see no need to have N75 back in the loop.
I used to run MBC in parallel, switched to MBC only later and can't say for certain that boost tapered changed much. With that said, I'm very happy with MBC only drivability so I see no need to have N75 back in the loop.
09-27-2006, 03:01 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In theory maybe, in reality, not in my case (k04s).
Both GIAC X and ASP stg 2+ software. MBC installed in parallel I could hold boost as high as I wanted. Without the TCD it would taper.
ASP 2+ was a little funny since the initial ramp-up would hold 16psi for a second or so then climb up to MBC set-point.
Limp mode still worked (which is good for safety).
ASP 2+ was a little funny since the initial ramp-up would hold 16psi for a second or so then climb up to MBC set-point.
Limp mode still worked (which is good for safety).
09-27-2006, 05:44 PM
#7
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand what you're saying. You could run MBC only and lower the spike all you want.
If you want to customize the curve, you need an EBC. Mine is still for sale if you're interested. ;-)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ski ya later
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
7
05-12-2006 12:08 PM
sj6sp
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
1
10-12-2003 06:46 PM
