Some weird boost behavior (more)
#151
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so it is possible...
and i'm not sure what problem your car has with
x, but i'd say try another x chipped ecu.
i did, unfortunately that didn't change a thing
in my car. my car doesn't respond to t box
x programs like most cars do...
but then, i'm not surprised... i mean, a mass
produced chip, running the car near its safe
power limit...
no way it's gonna run fine in every car imho.
these cars aren't all the same, some are stronger,
some weaker, and some are just plain different.
same parts can react differently when all put
together... too many damn variables.
and i'm not sure what problem your car has with
x, but i'd say try another x chipped ecu.
i did, unfortunately that didn't change a thing
in my car. my car doesn't respond to t box
x programs like most cars do...
but then, i'm not surprised... i mean, a mass
produced chip, running the car near its safe
power limit...
no way it's gonna run fine in every car imho.
these cars aren't all the same, some are stronger,
some weaker, and some are just plain different.
same parts can react differently when all put
together... too many damn variables.
#152
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i don't get it...
everything i wrote is true.
hell, you said yourself that you hadn't seen
a car react the way mine did, so all you could
have done was blame the car.
all i was saying in that post is that your
company kept blaming the car. turned out that
it WASN'T the car?!?
go figure. i'm not sure why this is a problem
for you. hell, mike doesn't have a problem with
x overboosting... simple fix, mbc...
i agree, i liked x when i found the m box code
worked. i don't get why you have a problem with
what i posted in that specific post.
i linked to your post, where you say
"Since the preponderance of evidence showed that there was not a chip programming issue, what recourse did we have except to suggest evaluating the car itself as the possible source of problems? "
i had no problem with evaluating the car, except
that's not what you guys suggested... all i was
told was "it must be something wrong with your car"
which is great, but i got absolutely no hints
as to what to check out!!
that's what i was upset about, and i'm not
sure you really understood that.
i didn't expect you to fix the car.
i expected some ideas... that's it...
i expected the great customer service that
i'd been hearing about... the great customer
service that i had heard about is what led
me to buy everything from your shop.
everything i wrote is true.
hell, you said yourself that you hadn't seen
a car react the way mine did, so all you could
have done was blame the car.
all i was saying in that post is that your
company kept blaming the car. turned out that
it WASN'T the car?!?
go figure. i'm not sure why this is a problem
for you. hell, mike doesn't have a problem with
x overboosting... simple fix, mbc...
i agree, i liked x when i found the m box code
worked. i don't get why you have a problem with
what i posted in that specific post.
i linked to your post, where you say
"Since the preponderance of evidence showed that there was not a chip programming issue, what recourse did we have except to suggest evaluating the car itself as the possible source of problems? "
i had no problem with evaluating the car, except
that's not what you guys suggested... all i was
told was "it must be something wrong with your car"
which is great, but i got absolutely no hints
as to what to check out!!
that's what i was upset about, and i'm not
sure you really understood that.
i didn't expect you to fix the car.
i expected some ideas... that's it...
i expected the great customer service that
i'd been hearing about... the great customer
service that i had heard about is what led
me to buy everything from your shop.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
p3u
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
24
10-18-2005 01:48 PM
Joseph111
A4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
2
10-22-2002 02:55 PM