S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion Discussion forum for the B5 Audi S4 & RS4 produced from 1998-2002

Something I've been thinking about (turbos on S4)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2000, 02:37 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Alex Milenkovic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Something I've been thinking about (turbos on S4)

In a former life (read: past car) I had a turbo monkey as well, a '97 Ecilpse GS-T.

The eclipse comes with a 2.0l 4 cyl, that has a single turbo. Out of the factory it comes with a Garett T25 turbo.

Many DSM enthusiasts rename this turbo the "T 2 Small" because it is precisely that. The stock Eclipse gets something like 10 psi of boost, but the turbo cannot produce the necessary volume of airflow past 5000 or so RPM.

Now, from what I understand of the S4, the upgrade path for the turbos is to dump the KKK 03s and put in Garett T25s. The upgrade path for the eclipse, however, is to dump the T25 and put in a Mitsubishi 16g. One of the biggest things that was explained to me is that turbos have two characteristics: Pressure and Flow. And that even though a larger turbo may be run at the same pressure (10 lbs or whatever) by virtue of the higher flow it will be better, and it will be able to keep up with the engine.

My question is, if the T25 is too small for a 2l 4cyl, how on earth can the significantly-smaller-than-the-T25 KKK03s be even adequate? Yeah, each one only has to run half a bank (which is 3 cyl and 1.35l of displacement) but I still find it hard to believe that the stock turbos can keep up enough flow at high RPMs.

I'm pretty sure I've never seen anyone on here talk about putting T25s in their 2000 S4. But for all the tuning shops, and all the people that know the tuning shops, has this come up as an issue? Does the Audi engine have issues with high amounts of flow, but is okay with pressure?

Thanks.

Alex.
Old 02-28-2000, 02:50 PM
  #2  
New Member
 
ErikR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I think you said it...

2l for a T25. Turbo selection, as you know, is a compromise based on efficiency maps. The eclipse also had a low compression motor (at least in the gen.1), this means the engine can take the volume. With the S4, at the stock compression, you really just want a bit better top end flow with little lower end loss (make 1 bar over the whole rpm range).
Old 02-28-2000, 03:11 PM
  #3  
Elder Member
 
George @ BostonAudi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 15,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Something I've been thinking about (turbos on S4)

I was under the impression the S4 upgrade path (Stage 3+) was KKK04 turbos?

I think one of the tuner shops has information about that on their website, but off the top of my head I can't think which one...
Old 02-28-2000, 04:37 PM
  #4  
New Member
 
quikslvrS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hey alex did you ever get your eclipse featured in a magazine???

name looks familiar
Old 02-28-2000, 04:45 PM
  #5  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Alex Milenkovic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Nope, but did lots of work to eclipse (more)

No.. it really wasn't anything that special.. I took it up from 210 crank hp (170 wheel) to about 270-320 crank hp (225-270 wheel) depending on weather etc. I did suspension work, race tires, etc, and found out something profound..

No matter how much you mod a semi cheapie car, it's still a semi cheapie car

I got the s4 and I absolutely love it. The only reason I use the eclipse as an example is because it's the only other turbo car I've looked at modding. And I'm aware of the issues people had modding it, since it's a fairly inexpensive car, it had a HUGE aftermarket following. Some funny pics sometimes too.. one guy showed his 16G (what I have) compared to his new Ball Bearing turbo... it is literally 2x-3x larger.. quite the funny "compare and contrast".

Anyway, with the S4, I've discovered how wonderful a well engineered and awesome car can feel. Quite frankly, unless the Evo VI comes over, I will only own german cars from now on.

Btw:
I have now seen at least 3+ mags with a Left Hand Drive EVO VI. Yet Mitsu is staunch in their claims that they won't bring it over. I doubt that highly. My hopes are up.

Alex.
Old 02-28-2000, 05:40 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Member
 
jmirandes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: just saw a left-hand drive EVO VI in the US last saturday

The car was imported to Puerto Rico and raced and the international speedway this past weekend. They say it was $60K+. Looks mean but kind of cheap-hey, it is nothing more than a mitsu mirange with regards to finishes and materials. It seems that it moves as well as claimed. The one I saw sits pretty high (looks like a Rallye car) and when breaking on the long it dipped down like crazy-needs some suspension mods in that department. I do not know where was it imported from but, it is here (Puerto Rico IS part of the US in case the question comes up..) it is left hand drive and I would not mind having one. Nevertheless, although different, I 'll keep the S4, the Evo is still a cheapie. If I had the money, would love to have it for track events.
Old 02-28-2000, 05:44 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
Mike O.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Logical upgrade path for KKK03/04

Having been down too many roads to recall with the KKK03/04, here is the real deal when it comes to upgrade paths.
1. KKK03
2. KKK03 with an IHI or Mitsubishi compressor wheel in original housing and stock exhaust turbine
3. Same as 2 but extrude honed
4. KKK04
5. KKK04 with a Mitsubishi compressor wheel and a clipped turbine to match compressor flow rate
6. Same as 5 but extrude honed.

I am here to tell you that a single #5 can turn 20 psi all day at redline on the 1.8T.

You really don't want to get away from the KKK03/04 housing and cartridge because of the compact size and interated wastegate that is designed to work with the ECU.

Start with a chip and exhaust. Then work on fuel delivery and lastly work on the turbos. Everyone automatically thinks that pumping more air = more power. It usually just means more problems.

Mike O.
Old 02-28-2000, 10:45 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
RS4.org - DaveH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The S4 has a problem getting enough air for cooling etc, this has been holding up some tuning mods
Old 02-29-2000, 05:04 AM
  #9  
DK
Member
 
DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: S4 turbo upgrades


Two K04 would certainly be easier as they bolt right into the stock manifold. From my experiences with the 1.8t, I feel that they do not provide enough of a performance gain worth the trouble of pulling out the engine.

The Garrett Ballistic Series T25 turbo is optimally rated for 280 hp (as published on the Honeywell website). For an S4, having one turbo for each bank of cylinders, two of these turbos seem to be ideal in order to maintain good throttle response and minimal lag. Ideally, better designed manifolds would be used.

If that is not enough, the Garrett GT25 is rated at 400 hp, and the GT30 is rated at 500 hp.

DK
Old 02-29-2000, 06:16 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
matthewk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

APR's upgrade for the turbos will have two GT25's


Quick Reply: Something I've been thinking about (turbos on S4)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM.