Are these MAF housing calculations correct?
#31
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the flow capabilities no? The thermal efficiency has been more than demonstrated(ie 40sec pulls on the ams dyno, and on highway pulls).
Indicative, but perhaps not definitive proof of the fmic's design. imnsho. ;-)
Indicative, but perhaps not definitive proof of the fmic's design. imnsho. ;-)
#32
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
now my maf is around 265-275g on top of it I'm runnig less boost but I feel the power is still the same when I was running more boost with low maf reading
#33
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
BUT I have a .05" division magnehelic which should show something at the lower rate. If indeed, it is there.
#38
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think there's gonna be a ton of diff b/w a 90 or 95mm. However the awe nascar-maf might be a different issue.