Those with RS4 airbox tops - do you keep the internal "bell housing" which...
01-08-2007, 09:05 PM
#1
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 6,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those with RS4 airbox tops - do you keep the internal "bell housing" which...
channels the airflow to the MAF tube or do you remove it? It seems like it would both help (channel airflow) and hurt (83mm smaller than I want to run) the airflow. NOt sure which is better. I'll be trying Buehn 85mm MAF for the time being.
01-09-2007, 07:11 AM
#4
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 6,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
*me* trolling or *YOU*??!! Where have you been??...
It was like almost 2 yrs ago that we did the Lemmi tweaking of the AMS software when Stage 2+...hehe.
I'm running the GIAC-x v.8 code and tweaking it. My system is flowing more air than I expected so my MAF readings with 83mm are high which seems to cause the ECU to dump too much fuel (AFR 10-11.5) despite me pulling -25% primary (max). I'm trying 85 this week.
Are you still Stage2+ with AMS?
I'm running the GIAC-x v.8 code and tweaking it. My system is flowing more air than I expected so my MAF readings with 83mm are high which seems to cause the ECU to dump too much fuel (AFR 10-11.5) despite me pulling -25% primary (max). I'm trying 85 this week.
Are you still Stage2+ with AMS?
Never tried Jacob's MAF on an RS4 box.
Trending Topics
01-09-2007, 02:10 PM
#10
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 6,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, mates up nicely. I was just talking about that internal tube in the RS4 airbox...
seems like it's a tad smaller (83mm diameter?) and there's a little gap between it and your MAF. Not sure if this will make a difference. Just thought I'd ask.